Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Chang, Andrew K. [1 ]
Bijur, Polly E. [1 ]
Davitt, Michelle [1 ]
Gallagher, E. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTOR; MORPHINE; EFFICACY; SAFETY; ANALGESIA; ETHNICITY; MEDICINE; MG/KG;
D O I
10.1007/s40266-013-0103-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Opioid titration is an effective strategy for treating pain; however, titration is generally impractical in the busy emergency department (ED) setting. Our objective was to test a rapid, two-step, hydromorphone titration protocol against usual care in older patients presenting to the ED with acute severe pain. This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of patients 65 years of age and older presenting to an adult, urban, academic ED with acute severe pain. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01429285). Patients randomized to the hydromorphone titration protocol initially received 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients randomized to usual care received any dose of any intravenous opioid. At 15 min, patients in both groups were asked, 'Do you want more pain medication?' Patients in the hydromorphone titration group who answered 'yes' received a second dose of 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone. Patients in the usual care group who answered 'yes' had their ED attending physician notified, who then could administer any (or no) additional medication. The primary efficacy outcome was satisfactory analgesia defined a priori as the patient declining additional analgesia at least once when asked at 15 or 60 min after administration of the initial opioid. Dose was calculated in morphine equivalent units (MEU: 1 mg hydromorphone = 7 mg morphine). The need for naloxone to reverse adverse opioid effects was the primary safety outcome. 83.0 % of 153 patients in the hydromorphone titration group achieved satisfactory analgesia compared with 82.5 % of 166 patients in the usual care group (p = 0.91). Patients in the hydromorphone titration group received lower mean initial doses of opioids at baseline than patients in the usual care group (3.5 MEU vs. 4.7 MEU, respectively; p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.001) and lower total opioids through 60 min (5.3 MEU vs. 6.0 MEU; p = 0.03). No patient needed naloxone. Low-dose titration of intravenous hydromorphone in increments of 0.5 mg provides comparable analgesia to usual care with less opioid over 60 min.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 754
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients
    Andrew K. Chang
    Polly E. Bijur
    Michelle Davitt
    E. John Gallagher
    Drugs & Aging, 2013, 30 : 747 - 754
  • [2] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of a Hydromorphone Titration Protocol to Usual Care in the Management of Adult Emergency Department Patients With Acute Severe Pain
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : 352 - 359
  • [3] Randomized Trial of Intravenous Lidocaine Versus Hydromorphone for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
    Chinn, Elliott
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    Naeem, Farnia
    Irizarry, Eddie
    Afrifa, Freda
    Zias, Eleftheria
    Jones, Michael P.
    Pearlman, Scott
    Chertoff, Andrew
    Wollowitz, Andrew
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [4] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Patient-Driven Titration Protocol of Intravenous Hydromorphone With Traditional Physician-Driven Management of Emergency Department Patients With Acute Severe Pain
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Davitt, Michelle
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 54 (04) : 561 - 567
  • [5] Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Intravenous Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
    Barnaby, Douglas P.
    Chertoff, Andrew E.
    Restivo, Andrew J.
    Campbell, Caron M.
    Pearlman, Scott
    White, Deborah
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 73 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [6] Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety of a Single 2-mg Intravenous Dose of Hydromorphone Versus Usual Care in the Management of Acute Pain
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Lupow, Jason B.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (02) : 185 - 192
  • [7] Randomized Clinical Trial of the 2 mg Hydromorphone Bolus Protocol Versus the "1+1" Hydromorphone Titration Protocol in Treatment of Acute, Severe Pain in the First Hour of Emergency Department Presentation
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Lupow, Jason B.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 62 (04) : 304 - 310
  • [8] Randomized Clinical Trial of Intravenous (IV) Acetaminophen as an Adjunct to IV Hydromorphone for Acute Severe Pain in Emergency Department Patients
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    White, Deborah
    Wollowitz, Andrew
    Campbell, Caron
    Jones, Michael P.
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Gallagher, E. John
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (08) : 717 - 724
  • [9] A Randomized Study of Intravenous Hydromorphone Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Older Adult Patients with Acute Severe Pain
    Kolli, Shilpa
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    Latev, Alex
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Naeem, Farnia
    Feliciano, Carmen
    Afrifa, Freda
    Walker, Christopher
    Izzo, Al
    Irizarry, Eddie
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (05) : 432 - 439
  • [10] INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE FOR ACUTE PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A RANDOMIZED PILOT TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Jeffrey, Iain
    Halpern, Zachary
    Adebayo, Adebanke
    Wing, Tom
    Lee, Amy S.
    Ruiz, Josel
    Persaud, Kevin
    Davenport, Lilia
    de Souza, Sylvie
    Williams, Mollie
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (03): : 301 - 307