Neoproterozoic banded iron formations

被引:60
|
作者
Ilyin, A. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Geol, Moscow 119017, Russia
关键词
SIDERITE FORMATION; MONGOLIAN MASSIF; ORE EPOCHS; AGE; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1134/S0024490209010064
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two epochs of the formation of ferruginous quartzites-Archean-Paleoproterozoic (3.2-1.8 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.85-0.7 Ga)-are distinguished in the Precambrian. They are incommensurable in scale: the Paleoproterozoic Kursk Group of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly (KMA) extends over 1500 km, whereas the extension of Neoproterozoic banded iron formations (BIF) beds does not exceed a few tens of kilometers. Their thickness is up to 200 m and not more than 10 m, respectively. The oldest BIFs are located in old platforms, whereas Neoproterozoic BIFs are mainly confined to Phanerozoic orogenic (mobile) zones. Neoproterozoic BIFs universally associate with glacial deposits and their beds include glacial dropstones. In places, they underlie tillites of the Laplandian (Marinoan) glaciation (635 Ma), but they are more often sandwiched between glaciogenic sequences of the Laplandian and preceding Sturtian or Rapitan glaciation (730-750 Ma). Neoproterozoic BIFs are rather diverse in terms of lithology due to variation in the grade of metamorphism from place to place from low grades of the greenschist facies up to the granulite facies. Correspondingly, the ore component is mainly represented by hematite or magnetite. The REE distribution and (Co + Ni + Cu) index suggest an influence of hydrothermal sources of Fe, although it was subordinate to the continental washout. Iron was accumulated in seawater during glaciations, whereas iron mineralization took place at the earliest stages of postglacial transgressions.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hydrogeological constraints on the formation of Palaeoproterozoic banded iron formations
    Robbins, Leslie J.
    Funk, Sean P.
    Flynn, Shannon L.
    Warchola, Tyler J.
    Li, Zhiquan
    Lalonde, Stefan V.
    Rostron, Benjamin J.
    Smith, Albertus J. B.
    Beukes, Nicolas J.
    de Kock, Michiel O.
    Heaman, Larry M.
    Alessi, Daniel S.
    Konhauser, Kurt O.
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2019, 12 (07) : 558 - +
  • [42] Banded Iron Formations (Jaspilites): The Paleontologist's View
    Astafieva, M. M.
    PALEONTOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 55 (03) : 343 - 354
  • [43] Plate tectonics caused the demise of banded iron formations
    Lascelles, D.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTIONS OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION B-APPLIED EARTH SCIENCE, 2013, 122 (04): : 230 - 241
  • [44] A review of the microbial geochemistry of banded iron-formations
    Brown, DA
    Gross, GA
    Sawicki, JA
    CANADIAN MINERALOGIST, 1995, 33 : 1321 - 1333
  • [45] Banded Iron Formations (Jaspilites): The Paleontologist’s View
    M. M. Astafieva
    Paleontological Journal, 2021, 55 : 343 - 354
  • [46] Simulated diagenesis of the iron-silica precipitates in banded iron formations
    Hinz, Isaac L.
    Rossi, Leanne
    Ma, Chi
    Johnson, Jena E.
    AMERICAN MINERALOGIST, 2023, 108 (09) : 1732 - 1753
  • [47] Iron isotopic variations of the Cryogenian banded iron formations: A new model
    Zhu, Xiang-Kun
    Sun, Jian
    Li, Zhi-Hong
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2019, 331
  • [48] Biologically recycled continental iron is a major component in banded iron formations
    Li, Weiqiang
    Beard, Brian L.
    Johnson, Clark M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (27) : 8193 - 8198
  • [49] IRON REDUCTION BY BACTERIA - A POTENTIAL ROLE IN THE GENESIS OF BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    NEALSON, KH
    MYERS, CR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1990, 290A : 35 - 45
  • [50] Apatite and magnetite as probes into dissimilatory iron reduction in banded iron formations
    Hu, Tianyang
    Robbins, Leslie J.
    Konhauser, Kurt O.
    Liu, Lei
    Bishop, Brendan A.
    Chi, Guoxiang
    Xu, Lijuan
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2025, 678