Neoproterozoic banded iron formations

被引:60
|
作者
Ilyin, A. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Geol, Moscow 119017, Russia
关键词
SIDERITE FORMATION; MONGOLIAN MASSIF; ORE EPOCHS; AGE; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1134/S0024490209010064
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two epochs of the formation of ferruginous quartzites-Archean-Paleoproterozoic (3.2-1.8 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.85-0.7 Ga)-are distinguished in the Precambrian. They are incommensurable in scale: the Paleoproterozoic Kursk Group of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly (KMA) extends over 1500 km, whereas the extension of Neoproterozoic banded iron formations (BIF) beds does not exceed a few tens of kilometers. Their thickness is up to 200 m and not more than 10 m, respectively. The oldest BIFs are located in old platforms, whereas Neoproterozoic BIFs are mainly confined to Phanerozoic orogenic (mobile) zones. Neoproterozoic BIFs universally associate with glacial deposits and their beds include glacial dropstones. In places, they underlie tillites of the Laplandian (Marinoan) glaciation (635 Ma), but they are more often sandwiched between glaciogenic sequences of the Laplandian and preceding Sturtian or Rapitan glaciation (730-750 Ma). Neoproterozoic BIFs are rather diverse in terms of lithology due to variation in the grade of metamorphism from place to place from low grades of the greenschist facies up to the granulite facies. Correspondingly, the ore component is mainly represented by hematite or magnetite. The REE distribution and (Co + Ni + Cu) index suggest an influence of hydrothermal sources of Fe, although it was subordinate to the continental washout. Iron was accumulated in seawater during glaciations, whereas iron mineralization took place at the earliest stages of postglacial transgressions.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AGES OF PRECAMBRIAN BANDED IRON-FORMATIONS
    GOLDICH, SS
    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 1973, 68 (07) : 1126 - 1134
  • [22] Genesis of banded iron-formations - A discussion
    Rosiere, CA
    Chemale, F
    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND THE BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGISTS, 1996, 91 (02): : 466 - 468
  • [23] BANDED IRON FORMATIONS OF PRECAMBRIAN AGE IN INDIA
    PICHAMUTHU, CS
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 1974, 15 (01) : 1 - 30
  • [24] Banded Iron Formations to Iron Ore: An Integrated Genesis Model
    Beukes, Nicolas J.
    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 2020, 115 (04) : 945 - 946
  • [25] Geochemistry and mineralogy of neoproterozoic banded iron-formations and some selected, siliceous manganese formations from the Urucum district, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
    Klein, C
    Ladeira, EA
    ECONOMIC GEOLOGY, 2004, 99 (06) : 1233 - 1244
  • [26] Hydrogeological constraints on the formation of Palaeoproterozoic banded iron formations
    Leslie J. Robbins
    Sean P. Funk
    Shannon L. Flynn
    Tyler J. Warchola
    Zhiquan Li
    Stefan V. Lalonde
    Benjamin J. Rostron
    Albertus J. B. Smith
    Nicolas J. Beukes
    Michiel O. de Kock
    Larry M. Heaman
    Daniel S. Alessi
    Kurt O. Konhauser
    Nature Geoscience, 2019, 12 : 558 - 563
  • [27] Banded iron formations as monitors of Archaean seawater composition
    Chapman, HJ
    Bickle, MJ
    Hunter, MA
    Fowler, CMR
    Nisbet, EG
    Martin, A
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 66 (15A) : A129 - A129
  • [28] Relevance of the Archaean atmosphere to the genesis of banded iron formations
    Law, Jonathan
    Phillips, G. Neil
    Myers, Russell E.
    AusIMM Bulletin, 2002, (06): : 28 - 30
  • [29] Origins of hematite, magnetite and siderite in banded iron formations
    Ohmoto, H.
    Hoashi, M.
    Otake, T.
    Bevacqua, D.
    Watanabe, Y.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2008, 72 (12) : A699 - A699
  • [30] The autosem ore characterisation of conglomeratic and banded iron formations
    Tonzetic, Igor
    Duncan, Michael
    Bramdeo, Siksha
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2014, 61 : 54 - 65