Current Status and Challenges of DNA Base Editing Tools

被引:83
|
作者
Jeong, You Kyeong [1 ,2 ]
Song, Beomjong [3 ]
Bae, Sangsu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Chem, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Convergence Basic Sci, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] Univ Tokyo, Int Res Ctr Neurointelligence WPI IRCN, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
OFF-TARGET; WEB TOOL; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL BASIS; GENOMIC DNA; CRISPR; CAS9; DEAMINATION; DIVERSITY; APOBEC3A;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.07.021
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
CRISPR-mediated DNA base editors, which include cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs), are promising tools that can induce point mutations at desired sites in a targeted manner to correct or disrupt gene expression. Their high editing efficiency, coupled with their ability to generate a targeted mutation without generating a DNA double-strand break (DSB) or requiring a donor DNA template, suggests that DNA base editors will be useful for treating genetic diseases, among other applications. However, this hope has recently been challenged by the discovery of DNA base editor shortcomings, including off-target DNA editing, the generation of bystander mutations, and promiscuous deamination effects in both DNA and RNA, which arise from the main DNA base editor constituents, a Cas nuclease variant and a deaminase. In this review, we summarize information about the DNA base editors that have been developed to date, introduce their associated potential challenges, and describe current efforts to minimize or mitigate those issues of DNA base editors.
引用
收藏
页码:1938 / 1952
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia
    Yan Zhang
    Jemma Restall
    Peter Crisp
    Ian Godwin
    Guoquan Liu
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2021, 57 : 574 - 583
  • [42] Gene editing on the farm: Current status and future prospects
    Beaton, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 12 - 12
  • [43] Genome editing on finfish: Current status and implications for sustainability
    Blix, Torill Bakkelund
    Dalmo, Roy Ambli
    Wargelius, Anna
    Myhr, Anne Ingeborg
    REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2021, 13 (04) : 2344 - 2363
  • [44] Current status of genome editing in vector mosquitoes: A review
    Reegan, Appadurai Daniel
    Ceasar, Stanislaus Antony
    Paulraj, Michael Gabriel
    Ignacimuthu, Savarimuthu
    Al-Dhabi, Naif Abdullah
    BioScience Trends, 2016, 10 (06) : 424 - 432
  • [45] Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia
    Zhang, Yan
    Restall, Jemma
    Crisp, Peter
    Godwin, Ian
    Liu, Guoquan
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2021, 57 (04) : 574 - 583
  • [46] Current status and perspectives of genome editing technology for microalgae
    Seungjib Jeon
    Jong-Min Lim
    Hyung-Gwan Lee
    Sung-Eun Shin
    Nam Kyu Kang
    Youn-Il Park
    Hee-Mock Oh
    Won-Joong Jeong
    Byeong-ryool Jeong
    Yong Keun Chang
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10
  • [47] Base editing in crops: current advances, limitations and future implications
    Mishra, Rukmini
    Joshi, Raj Kumar
    Zhao, Kaijun
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 18 (01) : 20 - 31
  • [48] DNA Base Editing in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
    Koblan, Luke W.
    Doherty, Sean P.
    Levy, Jon M.
    Erdos, Michael R.
    Collins, Francis S.
    Lin, Charles Y.
    Liu, David R.
    Brown, Jonathan D.
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2019, 39
  • [49] Targeted A-to-G base editing of chloroplast DNA in plants
    Young Geun Mok
    Sunghyun Hong
    Su-Ji Bae
    Sung-Ik Cho
    Jin-Soo Kim
    Nature Plants, 2022, 8 : 1378 - 1384
  • [50] The Design and Application of DNA-Editing Enzymes as Base Editors
    Rallapalli, Kartik L.
    Komor, Alexis C.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 92 : 43 - 79