AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams

被引:1244
|
作者
Almond, PR [1 ]
Biggs, PJ
Coursey, BM
Hanson, WF
Huq, MS
Nath, R
Rogers, DWO
机构
[1] Brown Canc Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Ionizing Radiat Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[7] Natl Res Council Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.598691
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A protocol is prescribed for clinical reference dosimetry of external beam radiation therapy using photon beams with nominal energies between Co-60 and 50 MV and electron beams with nominal energies between 4 and 50 MeV. The protocol was written by Task Group 51 (TG-51) of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and has been formally approved by the AAPM for clinical use. The protocol uses ion chambers with absorbed-dose-to-water calibration factors, N-D,w(60Co), which are traceable to national primary standards, and the equation D-w(Q) = Mk(Q)N(D,w)(60Co), where Q is the beam quality of the clinical beam, DP is the absorbed dose to water at the point of measurement of the ion chamber placed under reference conditions, M is the fully corrected ion chamber reading, and kg is the quality conversion factor which converts the calibration factor for a Co-60 beam to that for a beam of quality Q. Values of ka are presented as a function of Q for many ion chambers. The value of M is given by M = PionPTPPelecPpolMraw, where M-raw is the raw, uncorrected ion chamber reading and P-ion corrects for ion recombination, P-TP for temperature and pressure variations, P-elec for inaccuracy of the electrometer if calibrated separately, and P-pol for chamber polarity effects. Beam quality, Q, is specified (i) for photon beams, by %dd(10)(x), the photon component of the percentage depth dose at 10 cm depth for a field size of 10 x 10 cm(2) on the surface of a phantom at an SSD of 100 cm and (ii) for electron beams, by R-50, the depth at which the absorbed-dose falls to 50% of the maximum dose in a beam with field size greater than or equal to 10 x 10 cm(2) on the surface of the phantom (greater than or equal to 20 x 20 cm(2) for R-50> 8.5 cm) at an SSD of 100 cm. R-50 is determined directly from the measured value of I-50, the depth at which the ionization falls to 50% of its maximum value. All clinical reference dosimetry is performed in a water phantom. The reference depth for calibration purposes is 10 cm for photon beams and 0.6R(50)-0.1 cm for electron beams. For photon beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed in either an SSD or SAD setup with a 10 x 10 cm(2) field size defined on the phantom surface for an SSD setup or at the depth of the detector for an SAD setup. For electron beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed with a field size of greater than or equal to 10 x 10 cm(2) (greater than or equal to 20 x 20 cm(2) for R-50> 8.5 cm) at an SSD between 90 and 110 cm. This protocol represents a major simplification compared to the AAPM's TG-21 protocol in the sense that large tables of stopping-power ratios and mass-energy absorption coefficients are not needed and the user does not need to calculate any theoretical dosimetry factors. Worksheets for various situations are presented along with a list of equipment required. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(99)00209-6].
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1870
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams
    McEwen, Malcolm
    DeWerd, Larry
    Ibbott, Geoffrey
    Followill, David
    Rogers, David W. O.
    Seltzer, Stephen
    Seuntjens, Jan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (04)
  • [2] Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: Comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols
    Huq, MS
    Andreo, P
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [3] Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: Comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols
    Huq, MS
    Song, HJ
    Andreo, P
    Houser, CJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (10) : 2077 - 2087
  • [4] AAPM WGTG51 Report 385: Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy electron beams
    Muir, Bryan
    Davis, Stephen
    Dhanesar, Sandeep
    Hillman, Yair
    Iakovenko, Viktor
    Kim, Grace Gwe-Ya
    Alves, Victor Gabriel Leandro
    Lei, Yu
    Lowenstein, Jessica
    Renaud, James
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    Siebers, Jeffrey
    Tantot, Laurent
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (09) : 5840 - 5857
  • [5] Comment on "AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams" [Med. Phys. 26, 1847-1870 (1999)]
    Khan, FM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) : 445 - 447
  • [6] Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols
    McCaw, Travis J.
    Hwang, Min-Sig
    Jang, Si Young
    Huq, M. Saiful
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (04): : 140 - 143
  • [7] Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Huq, MS
    Andreo, P
    Song, HJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (11): : 2985 - 3006
  • [8] Clinical reference dosimetry: Comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols
    Ding, GX
    Cygler, JE
    Kwok, CB
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) : 1217 - 1225
  • [9] Comment on clinical implementation of the AAPM's Task Group-51 protocol for calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Rodgers, JE
    Niroomand-Rad, A
    Lundsten, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) : 1995 - 1996
  • [10] AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG-51 reference dosimetry
    Muir, Bryan
    Culberson, Wesley
    Davis, Stephen
    Kim, Grace Gwe-Ya
    Lee, Sung-Woo
    Lowenstein, Jessica
    Renaud, James
    Sarfehnia, Arman
    Siebers, Jeffrey
    Tantot, Laurent
    Tolani, Naresh
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (11) : 6739 - 6764