AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams

被引:1244
|
作者
Almond, PR [1 ]
Biggs, PJ
Coursey, BM
Hanson, WF
Huq, MS
Nath, R
Rogers, DWO
机构
[1] Brown Canc Ctr, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Ionizing Radiat Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Kimmel Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[7] Natl Res Council Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.598691
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A protocol is prescribed for clinical reference dosimetry of external beam radiation therapy using photon beams with nominal energies between Co-60 and 50 MV and electron beams with nominal energies between 4 and 50 MeV. The protocol was written by Task Group 51 (TG-51) of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and has been formally approved by the AAPM for clinical use. The protocol uses ion chambers with absorbed-dose-to-water calibration factors, N-D,w(60Co), which are traceable to national primary standards, and the equation D-w(Q) = Mk(Q)N(D,w)(60Co), where Q is the beam quality of the clinical beam, DP is the absorbed dose to water at the point of measurement of the ion chamber placed under reference conditions, M is the fully corrected ion chamber reading, and kg is the quality conversion factor which converts the calibration factor for a Co-60 beam to that for a beam of quality Q. Values of ka are presented as a function of Q for many ion chambers. The value of M is given by M = PionPTPPelecPpolMraw, where M-raw is the raw, uncorrected ion chamber reading and P-ion corrects for ion recombination, P-TP for temperature and pressure variations, P-elec for inaccuracy of the electrometer if calibrated separately, and P-pol for chamber polarity effects. Beam quality, Q, is specified (i) for photon beams, by %dd(10)(x), the photon component of the percentage depth dose at 10 cm depth for a field size of 10 x 10 cm(2) on the surface of a phantom at an SSD of 100 cm and (ii) for electron beams, by R-50, the depth at which the absorbed-dose falls to 50% of the maximum dose in a beam with field size greater than or equal to 10 x 10 cm(2) on the surface of the phantom (greater than or equal to 20 x 20 cm(2) for R-50> 8.5 cm) at an SSD of 100 cm. R-50 is determined directly from the measured value of I-50, the depth at which the ionization falls to 50% of its maximum value. All clinical reference dosimetry is performed in a water phantom. The reference depth for calibration purposes is 10 cm for photon beams and 0.6R(50)-0.1 cm for electron beams. For photon beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed in either an SSD or SAD setup with a 10 x 10 cm(2) field size defined on the phantom surface for an SSD setup or at the depth of the detector for an SAD setup. For electron beams clinical reference dosimetry is performed with a field size of greater than or equal to 10 x 10 cm(2) (greater than or equal to 20 x 20 cm(2) for R-50> 8.5 cm) at an SSD between 90 and 110 cm. This protocol represents a major simplification compared to the AAPM's TG-21 protocol in the sense that large tables of stopping-power ratios and mass-energy absorption coefficients are not needed and the user does not need to calculate any theoretical dosimetry factors. Worksheets for various situations are presented along with a list of equipment required. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(99)00209-6].
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1870
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Standard Dosimetry Protocol in Japan and AAPM TG-51 Addendum in Order to Establish Optimal Dosimetry for FFF Beam
    Matsunaga, T.
    Hayashi, N.
    Adachi, Y.
    Nozue, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3663 - 3663
  • [22] Comparison of Absorbed-Dose to Water in High-Energy Photon Beams Based On Addendum AAPM TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JS']JSMP 12
    Kinoshita, N.
    Oguchi, H.
    Kita, A.
    Yoshioka, C.
    Sasamoto, K.
    Nishimoto, Y.
    Adachi, T.
    Shioura, H.
    Kimura, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3379 - 3379
  • [23] THE NEW AAPM PROTOCOL FOR THE DETERMINATION OF DOSE FROM HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON AND ELECTRON-BEAMS
    STERNICK, ES
    SCHULZ, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (03): : 645 - 646
  • [24] Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51
    Castrillon, Silvia Vargas
    Henriquez, Francisco Cutanda
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (01): : 136 - 146
  • [25] Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51
    Yulinar, Cica
    Assegab, Muhamad Iqbal
    Wibowo, Wahyu Edy
    Pawiro, Supriyanto Ardjo
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [26] A diamond detector in the dosimetry of high-energy electron and photon beams
    Laub, WU
    Kaulich, TW
    Nüsslin, F
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (09): : 2183 - 2192
  • [27] New KQ Factors for Reference Dosimetry in High-Energy Photon Beams
    McEwen, M.
    Rogers, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2994 - +
  • [28] SWISS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DOSIMETRY OF HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS AND ELECTRON-BEAMS
    ANDRE, L
    VONARX, A
    CORD, I
    GARAVAGLIA, G
    JONESCU, F
    VALLEY, JF
    HELVETICA PHYSICA ACTA, 1987, 60 (02): : 262 - 262
  • [30] Difference in using the TRS-398 code of practice and TG-51 dosimetry protocol for FFF beams
    Lye, J.
    Butler, D. J.
    Oliver, C. P.
    Alves, A.
    Williams, I. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S33 - S34