Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator

被引:15
|
作者
Rivard, Justin D. [1 ]
Vergis, Ashley S. [1 ]
Unger, Bertram J. [2 ]
Hardy, Krista M. [1 ]
Andrew, Chris G. [1 ]
Gillman, Lawrence M. [1 ]
Park, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Surg, St Boniface Gen Hosp, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med Educ, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
关键词
Evaluation; Education; Laparoscopic surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality; Validation; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATION; BENCH MODEL FIDELITY; OPERATING-ROOM; SKILLS; PROFICIENCY; IMPACT; ACQUISITION; TRAINER; FUNDAMENTALS; LAPSIM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3414-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Computer-based surgical simulators capture a multitude of metrics based on different aspects of performance, such as speed, accuracy, and movement efficiency. However, without rigorous assessment, it may be unclear whether all, some, or none of these metrics actually reflect technical skill, which can compromise educational efforts on these simulators. We assessed the construct validity of individual performance metrics on the LapVR simulator (Immersion Medical, San Jose, CA, USA) and used these data to create task-specific summary metrics. Medical students with no prior laparoscopic experience (novices, N = 12), junior surgical residents with some laparoscopic experience (intermediates, N = 12), and experienced surgeons (experts, N = 11) all completed three repetitions of four LapVR simulator tasks. The tasks included three basic skills (peg transfer, cutting, clipping) and one procedural skill (adhesiolysis). We selected 36 individual metrics on the four tasks that assessed six different aspects of performance, including speed, motion path length, respect for tissue, accuracy, task-specific errors, and successful task completion. Four of seven individual metrics assessed for peg transfer, six of ten metrics for cutting, four of nine metrics for clipping, and three of ten metrics for adhesiolysis discriminated between experience levels. Time and motion path length were significant on all four tasks. We used the validated individual metrics to create summary equations for each task, which successfully distinguished between the different experience levels. Educators should maintain some skepticism when reviewing the plethora of metrics captured by computer-based simulators, as some but not all are valid. We showed the construct validity of a limited number of individual metrics and developed summary metrics for the LapVR. The summary metrics provide a succinct way of assessing skill with a single metric for each task, but require further validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1921 / 1928
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TRAINING IN VIRTUAL REALITY: CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY SIMULATOR
    Persoon, M. C.
    Wijn, R. P. W. F.
    Schout, B. M. A.
    Martens, E. J.
    Hendrikx, A. J. M.
    Scherpbier, A. J. J. A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 130 - 130
  • [22] Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Nephrectomy Simulator Is Lacking in Construct Validity
    Wijn, R. P. W. F.
    Persoon, M. C.
    Schout, B. M. A.
    Martens, E. J.
    Scherpbier, A. J. J. A.
    Hendrikx, A. J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 117 - 122
  • [23] Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator
    Luisa F. Sánchez-Peralta
    Francisco M. Sánchez-Margallo
    José Luis Moyano-Cuevas
    José Blas Pagador
    Silvia Enciso-Sanz
    Patricia Sánchez-González
    Enrique J. Gómez-Aguilera
    Jesús Usón-Gargallo
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, 5 : 307 - 315
  • [24] Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®)
    Zhang, Aimin
    Huenerbein, Michael
    Dai, Yiyang
    Schlag, Peter M.
    Beller, Siegfried
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (06): : 1440 - 1444
  • [25] Construct and predictive validity testing of the lapmentorTM laparoscopic surgical simulator
    Sargent, Eric R.
    Box, Geoffrey N.
    Vlaovic, Peter D.
    Matsuda, Tadashi
    Corica, Federico
    Boker, John R.
    Bonn, James F.
    Ono, Yoshinari
    Clayman, Ralph V.
    McDougall, Elspeth M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 319 - 319
  • [26] Construct and face validity of SINERGIA laparoscopic virtual reality simulator
    Sanchez-Peralta, Luisa F.
    Sanchez-Margallo, Francisco M.
    Moyano-Cuevas, Jose Luis
    Blas Pagador, Jose
    Enciso-Sanz, Silvia
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, Patricia
    Gomez-Aguilera, Enrique J.
    Uson-Gargallo, Jesus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2010, 5 (04) : 307 - 315
  • [27] AN INTEGRATED COMPUTER-BASED DRYER SIMULATOR
    KIRANOUDIS, CT
    MAROULIS, ZB
    MARINOSKOURIS, D
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 18 (SUPPL) : S265 - S269
  • [28] Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study
    Zuo, Tianming
    Sun, Baozhi
    Guan, Xu
    Zheng, Bin
    Qu, Bo
    JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2021, 9 (04):
  • [29] A COMPUTER-BASED PATIENT CASE SIMULATOR
    MILLER, RA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 32 (02): : A651 - A651
  • [30] A Computer-Based Simulator of the Atmospheric Turbulence
    Konyaev, Petr A.
    21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEAN OPTICS: ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2015, 9680