Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator

被引:15
|
作者
Rivard, Justin D. [1 ]
Vergis, Ashley S. [1 ]
Unger, Bertram J. [2 ]
Hardy, Krista M. [1 ]
Andrew, Chris G. [1 ]
Gillman, Lawrence M. [1 ]
Park, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Surg, St Boniface Gen Hosp, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med Educ, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
关键词
Evaluation; Education; Laparoscopic surgery; Simulation; Virtual reality; Validation; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATION; BENCH MODEL FIDELITY; OPERATING-ROOM; SKILLS; PROFICIENCY; IMPACT; ACQUISITION; TRAINER; FUNDAMENTALS; LAPSIM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-013-3414-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Computer-based surgical simulators capture a multitude of metrics based on different aspects of performance, such as speed, accuracy, and movement efficiency. However, without rigorous assessment, it may be unclear whether all, some, or none of these metrics actually reflect technical skill, which can compromise educational efforts on these simulators. We assessed the construct validity of individual performance metrics on the LapVR simulator (Immersion Medical, San Jose, CA, USA) and used these data to create task-specific summary metrics. Medical students with no prior laparoscopic experience (novices, N = 12), junior surgical residents with some laparoscopic experience (intermediates, N = 12), and experienced surgeons (experts, N = 11) all completed three repetitions of four LapVR simulator tasks. The tasks included three basic skills (peg transfer, cutting, clipping) and one procedural skill (adhesiolysis). We selected 36 individual metrics on the four tasks that assessed six different aspects of performance, including speed, motion path length, respect for tissue, accuracy, task-specific errors, and successful task completion. Four of seven individual metrics assessed for peg transfer, six of ten metrics for cutting, four of nine metrics for clipping, and three of ten metrics for adhesiolysis discriminated between experience levels. Time and motion path length were significant on all four tasks. We used the validated individual metrics to create summary equations for each task, which successfully distinguished between the different experience levels. Educators should maintain some skepticism when reviewing the plethora of metrics captured by computer-based simulators, as some but not all are valid. We showed the construct validity of a limited number of individual metrics and developed summary metrics for the LapVR. The summary metrics provide a succinct way of assessing skill with a single metric for each task, but require further validation.
引用
收藏
页码:1921 / 1928
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Construct validity of individual and summary performance metrics associated with a computer-based laparoscopic simulator
    Justin D. Rivard
    Ashley S. Vergis
    Bertram J. Unger
    Krista M. Hardy
    Chris G. Andrew
    Lawrence M. Gillman
    Jason Park
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 1921 - 1928
  • [2] Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for ERCP
    Bittner, James G.
    Mellinger, John D.
    Imam, Toufic
    Schade, Robert R.
    MacFadyen, Bruce V., Jr.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (02) : 357 - 364
  • [3] Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Bittner, James G.
    Ezeamuzie, Obinna
    Imam, Toufic
    MacFadyen, Bruce V.
    Schade, Robert R.
    Mellinger, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (03) : S87 - S87
  • [4] Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Bittner, James G.
    Ezeamuzie, Obinna
    Imam, Toufic
    Macfadyen, Bruce V.
    Schade, Robert R.
    Mellinger, John D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB299 - AB299
  • [5] Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator
    Pellen, Michael G. C.
    Horgan, Liam F.
    Barton, J. Roger
    Attwood, Stephen E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (01): : 130 - 139
  • [6] Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator
    Gilliam, A. D.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 1150 - 1150
  • [7] Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator
    Michael G. C. Pellen
    Liam F. Horgan
    J. Roger Barton
    Stephen E. Attwood
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 130 - 139
  • [8] Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator
    A. D. Gilliam
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1150 - 1150
  • [9] Virtual Reality Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Colectomy: What Metrics Have Construct Validity?
    Shanmugan, Skandan
    Leblanc, Fabien
    Senagore, Anthony J.
    Ellis, C. Neal
    Stein, Sharon L.
    Khan, Sadaf
    Delaney, Conor P.
    Champagne, Bradley J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (02) : 210 - 214
  • [10] Construct validity of the LapMentor™ laparoscopic surgical simulator
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A183 - A183