Impact of narrowing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation

被引:3
|
作者
Allen, Lauren [1 ]
Bartash, Rachel [2 ,3 ]
Minamoto, Grace Y. [2 ,3 ]
Cowman, Kelsie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Patel, Snehal [3 ,5 ]
Vukelic, Sasa [3 ,5 ]
Nnani, Daryl U. [1 ]
Fauvel, Daphenie [3 ,5 ]
Guo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Bronx, NY USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Montefiore Hlth Syst, Network Performance Grp, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
antimicrobial stewardship; device infection; left ventricular assist devices; LVAD-associated infections; surgical infection prophylaxis; surgical site infections; INFECTIONS; VANCOMYCIN; HEART;
D O I
10.1111/tid.13900
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Although infections are a significant potential complication among patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, standardized surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens are not well defined. At Montefiore Medical Center, a 4-drug SIP regimen containing fluconazole, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin was previously utilized. In January 2020, the antimicrobial stewardship program implemented a 2-drug SIP regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin to limit exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study evaluated LVAD-associated infection rates prior to and following the SIP revision. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1/2018 to 4/2021 was performed. Infections were classified using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions. Infection rates at 2 weeks, 30 days, and 90 days post-implantation in the 4-drug SIP regimen (1/2018-12/2019) and the 2-drug SIP regimen (1/2020 to 4/2021) were compared. Results A total of 71 patients were included. The number of patients with LVAD-associated infections (including surgical site infections) was not significantly different in either SIP group at 2 weeks (9% vs. 4%, p = .64), 30 days (9% vs. 11%, p = .99), or 90 days (19% vs. 14%, p = .75). There was no statistically significant difference in 30 or 90-day mortality. LVAD-associated gram-negative (7% vs. 7%; p > .99) and fungal (5% vs. 0%; p = .51) infections were uncommon. The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus, and the most common type of infection was pneumonia in both SIP groups. Conclusion No significant difference in LVAD-associated infections or infection-related mortality was observed with de-escalation of perioperative antibiotics. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to endorse the findings of this study.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of concomitant operative procedures on left ventricular assist device implantation outcomes
    Nelson, D. M.
    Nelson, K. M.
    Lloyd, I. E.
    Kfoury, A. G.
    Nelson, K. E.
    Rasmusson, B. Y.
    Clayson, S. E.
    Reid, B. B.
    Long, J. W.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (02): : S199 - S200
  • [42] Single Versus Multidrug Regimen for Surgical Infection Prophylaxis in Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Aburjania, Nana
    Ertmer, Brennan M.
    Farid, Saira
    Berg, Melody
    Nienaber, Juhsien J. C.
    Tchantchaleishvili, Vakhtang
    Stulak, John M.
    Baddour, Larry M.
    Sohail, Muhammad R.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2018, 64 (06) : 735 - 740
  • [43] Stroke and pump thrombosis following left ventricular assist device implantation: The impact of the implantation technique
    Nozdrzykowski, Michal
    Bauer, Jessica-Marie
    Schulz, Uwe
    Jawad, Khalil
    Bireta, Christian
    Eifert, Sandra
    Sandri, Marcus
    Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska, Joanna
    Borger, Michael A.
    Saeed, Diyar
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [44] Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients after left ventricular reconstruction
    Palmen, Meindert
    Braun, Jerry
    Beeres, Saskia L. M. A.
    Klautz, Robert J. M.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 23 (06) : 979 - 981
  • [45] Surgical infection prophylaxis prior to left ventricular assist device implantation: A survey of clinical practice
    Mourad, Ahmad
    Arif, Sana
    Bishawi, Muath
    Milano, Carmelo
    Miller, Rachel A.
    Maskarinec, Stacey A.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (10) : 2672 - 2678
  • [46] Surgical Considerations for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Peer, Syed B.
    Loor, Gabriel
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2023, 50 (04)
  • [47] Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for Danon Cardiomyopathy
    Kitahara, Hiroto
    Nawata, Kan
    Kinoshita, Osamu
    Itoda, Yoshifumi
    Shintani, Yukako
    Fukayama, Masashi
    Ono, Minoru
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 103 (01): : E39 - E41
  • [48] Cognitive function and left ventricular assist device implantation
    Bhat, Geetha
    Yost, Gardner
    Mahoney, Edward
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (11): : 1398 - 1405
  • [49] Implantation of a left ventricular assist device in situs inversus
    Musci, M
    Jurmann, MJ
    Drews, T
    Yankah, C
    Kuppe, H
    Weng, YG
    Hetzer, R
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 74 (02): : 586 - 588
  • [50] Left ventricular assist device implantation strategies and outcomes
    Smith, LaVone A.
    Yarboro, Leora T.
    Kennedy, Jamie L. W.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2088 - 2096