Impact of narrowing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation

被引:3
|
作者
Allen, Lauren [1 ]
Bartash, Rachel [2 ,3 ]
Minamoto, Grace Y. [2 ,3 ]
Cowman, Kelsie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Patel, Snehal [3 ,5 ]
Vukelic, Sasa [3 ,5 ]
Nnani, Daryl U. [1 ]
Fauvel, Daphenie [3 ,5 ]
Guo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Bronx, NY USA
[3] Montefiore Med Ctr, 111 E 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[4] Montefiore Hlth Syst, Network Performance Grp, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
antimicrobial stewardship; device infection; left ventricular assist devices; LVAD-associated infections; surgical infection prophylaxis; surgical site infections; INFECTIONS; VANCOMYCIN; HEART;
D O I
10.1111/tid.13900
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Although infections are a significant potential complication among patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, standardized surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens are not well defined. At Montefiore Medical Center, a 4-drug SIP regimen containing fluconazole, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin was previously utilized. In January 2020, the antimicrobial stewardship program implemented a 2-drug SIP regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin to limit exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study evaluated LVAD-associated infection rates prior to and following the SIP revision. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1/2018 to 4/2021 was performed. Infections were classified using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions. Infection rates at 2 weeks, 30 days, and 90 days post-implantation in the 4-drug SIP regimen (1/2018-12/2019) and the 2-drug SIP regimen (1/2020 to 4/2021) were compared. Results A total of 71 patients were included. The number of patients with LVAD-associated infections (including surgical site infections) was not significantly different in either SIP group at 2 weeks (9% vs. 4%, p = .64), 30 days (9% vs. 11%, p = .99), or 90 days (19% vs. 14%, p = .75). There was no statistically significant difference in 30 or 90-day mortality. LVAD-associated gram-negative (7% vs. 7%; p > .99) and fungal (5% vs. 0%; p = .51) infections were uncommon. The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus, and the most common type of infection was pneumonia in both SIP groups. Conclusion No significant difference in LVAD-associated infections or infection-related mortality was observed with de-escalation of perioperative antibiotics. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to endorse the findings of this study.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stent implantation in a left ventricular assist device
    Alvarez Ramos, Raquel
    Andres Lalaguna, Luis Maria
    Diez Gil, Jose Luis
    REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 2 (01): : 59 - 60
  • [22] Implantation of the HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 23 (03) : 245 - 247
  • [23] Left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with left ventricular thrombus
    Dogan, Gunes
    Mariani, Silvia
    Hanke, Jasmin S.
    Deniz, Ezin
    Merzah, Ali
    Li, Tong
    Haverich, Axel
    Schmitto, Jan D.
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2021, 45 (09) : 1006 - 1013
  • [24] Preoperative Evaluation and Perioperative Management of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Marzec, Lucas N.
    Ambardekar, Amrut V.
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2013, 17 (04) : 249 - 261
  • [25] Perioperative management of the left ventricular assist device recipient
    Heath, MJS
    Dickstein, ML
    PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2000, 43 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [26] Impact of antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis of left ventricular assist device surgical infections
    Nguyen, Peter T.
    Sam, Teena
    Colley, Peter
    van Zyl, Johanna S.
    Felius, Joost
    Berhe, Mezgebe
    Meyer, Dan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (09) : 3052 - 3059
  • [27] Impact of Left Ventricular Size on Outcomes Following Heartmate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Nersesian, G.
    Jaiswal, A.
    Stein, J.
    Potapov, E.
    Baran, D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S284 - S285
  • [28] Ventricular arrhythmias after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Refaat, Marwan
    Chemaly, Elie
    Lebeche, Djamel
    Gwathmey, Judith K.
    Hajjar, Roger J.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (10): : 1246 - 1252
  • [29] Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in a Patient with Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm
    Radakovic, Dejan
    Penov, Kiril
    Gueder, Guelmisal
    Aleksic, Ivan
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON REPORTS, 2022, 11 (01): : E11 - E13
  • [30] Impact of 30 Day Readmission After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Cogswell, Rebecca J.
    Roy, Samit S.
    Spratt, John R.
    Liao, Kenneth K.
    Martin, Cindy M.
    John, Ranjit
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (03) : 252 - 256