Investigating the Origin of TMS-evoked Brain Potentials Using Topographic Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Sulcova, Dominika [1 ]
Salatino, Adriana [1 ,2 ]
Ivanoiu, Adrian [1 ,3 ]
Mouraux, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Neurosci IoNS, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[3] Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; electroencephalography; TMS-evoked potentials; microstate analysis; primary motor cortex; angular gyrus; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; MEDIAN NERVE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; EEG; OSCILLATIONS; EXCITABILITY; ACTIVATION; TUTORIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-022-00917-w
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) represents an increasingly popular tool to non-invasively probe cortical excitability in humans. TMS-evoked brain potentials (TEPs) are composed of successive components reflecting the propagation of activity from the site of stimulation, thereby providing information on the state of brain networks. However, TMS also generates peripherally evoked sensory activity which contributes to TEP waveforms and hinders their interpretation. In the present study, we examined whether topographic analysis of TEPs elicited by stimulation of two distinct cortical targets can disentangle confounding signals from the genuine TMS-evoked cortical response. In 20 healthy subjects, TEPs were evoked by stimulation of the left primary motor cortex (M1) and the left angular gyrus (AG). Topographic dissimilarity analysis and microstate analysis were used to identify target-specific TEP components. Furthermore, we explored the contribution of cortico-spinal activation by comparing TEPs elicited by stimulation below and above the threshold to evoke motor responses. We observed topographic dissimilarity between M1 and AG TEPs until approximately 80 ms post-stimulus and identified early TEP components that likely reflect specific TMS-evoked activity. Later components peaking at 100 and 180 ms were similar in both datasets and attributed to sensory-evoked activity. Analysis of sub- and supra-threshold M1 TEPs revealed a component at 17 ms that possibly reflects the cortico-spinal output of the stimulated area. Moreover, supra-threshold M1 activation influenced the topography of almost all later components. Together, our results demonstrate the utility of topographic analysis for the evaluation and interpretation of TMS-evoked EEG responses.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 598
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short-interval and long-interval intracortical inhibition of TMS-evoked EEG potentials
    Premoli, Isabella
    Kiraly, Julia
    Mueller-Dahlhaus, Florian
    Zipser, Carl M.
    Rossini, Pierre
    Zrenner, Christoph
    Ziemann, Ulf
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (04) : 818 - 827
  • [22] The effects of NMDA receptor blockade on TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex
    Nigel C. Rogasch
    Carl Zipser
    Ghazaleh Darmani
    Tuomas P. Mutanen
    Mana Biabani
    Christoph Zrenner
    Debora Desideri
    Paolo Belardinelli
    Florian Müller-Dahlhaus
    Ulf Ziemann
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [23] The effects of NMDA receptor blockade on TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex
    Rogasch, Nigel C.
    Zipser, Carl
    Darmani, Ghazaleh
    Mutanen, Tuomas P.
    Biabani, Mana
    Zrenner, Christoph
    Desideri, Debora
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    Mueller-Dahlhaus, Florian
    Ziemann, Ulf
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01) : 3168
  • [24] Stimulation Parameters Recruit Distinct Cortico-Cortical Pathways: Insights from Microstate Analysis on TMS-Evoked Potentials
    Lucarelli, Delia
    Guidali, Giacomo
    Sulcova, Dominika
    Zazio, Agnese
    Bonfiglio, Natale Salvatore
    Stango, Antonietta
    Barchiesi, Guido
    Bortoletto, Marta
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2025, 38 (03)
  • [25] Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric
    Freedberg, Michael
    Reeves, Jack A.
    Hussain, Sara J.
    Zaghloul, Kareem A.
    Wassermann, Eric M.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [26] Correspondence regarding "Letter to the editor: TMS-evoked potentials provide novel neurophysiological features of Tourette syndrome"
    Anis, Saar
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2025, 132
  • [27] Distilling the essence of TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs): A call for securing mechanistic specificity and experimental rigor
    Siebner, Hartwig Roman
    Conde, Virginia
    Tomasevic, Leo
    Thielscher, Axel
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (04) : 1051 - 1054
  • [28] Low-frequency rTMS inhibitory effects in the primary motor cortex: Insights from TMS-evoked potentials
    Casula, Elias P.
    Tarantino, Vincenza
    Basso, Demis
    Arcara, Giorgio
    Marino, Giuliana
    Toffolo, Gianna Maria
    Rothwell, John C.
    Bisiacchi, Patrizia S.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 98 : 225 - 232
  • [29] TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF SINGLE SWEEP EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN THE BRAIN
    LIBERATI, D
    DICORRADO, S
    MANDELLI, S
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1992, 39 (09) : 943 - 951
  • [30] Topographic analysis of flash visual evoked potentials in dogs
    Kimotsuki, T
    Yasuda, M
    Tamahara, S
    Matsuki, N
    Ono, K
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 67 (09): : 869 - 875