Stimulation Parameters Recruit Distinct Cortico-Cortical Pathways: Insights from Microstate Analysis on TMS-Evoked Potentials

被引:0
|
作者
Lucarelli, Delia [1 ,2 ]
Guidali, Giacomo [3 ]
Sulcova, Dominika [4 ]
Zazio, Agnese [1 ]
Bonfiglio, Natale Salvatore [5 ]
Stango, Antonietta [1 ]
Barchiesi, Guido [6 ]
Bortoletto, Marta [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Neurophysiol Lab, Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, Chieti, Pescara, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Milan Ctr Neurosci Neuromi, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[4] Inst Cognit & Affect Neurosci, MSH Med Sch Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[5] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Stat Serv, Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Milan, Dept Philosophy, Milan, Italy
[7] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Mol Mind Lab, Lucca, Italy
关键词
TMS-EEG; Motor cortex; Connectivity; Microstates; TMS-evoked potentials; Current direction; Pulse waveform; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; PRIMARY MOTOR CORTEX; EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY; CORTICAL REACTIVITY; CURRENT DIRECTIONS; CURRENT FLOW; WAVE-FORM; EEG; INHIBITION; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-025-01113-2
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) represent an innovative measure for examining brain connectivity and developing biomarkers of psychiatric conditions. Minimizing TEP variability across studies and participants, which may stem from methodological choices, is therefore vital. By combining classic peak analysis and microstate investigation, we tested how TMS pulse waveform and current direction may affect cortico-cortical circuit engagement when targeting the primary motor cortex (M1). We aim to disentangle whether changing these parameters affects the degree of activation of the same neural circuitry or may lead to changes in the pathways through which the induced activation spreads. Thirty-two healthy participants underwent a TMS-EEG experiment in which the pulse waveform (monophasic, biphasic) and current direction (posterior-anterior, anterior-posterior, latero-medial) were manipulated. We assessed the latency and amplitude of M1-TEP components and employed microstate analyses to test differences in topographies. Results revealed that TMS parameters strongly influenced M1-TEP components' amplitude but had a weaker role over their latencies. Microstate analysis showed that the current direction in monophasic stimulations changed the pattern of evoked microstates at the early TEP latencies, as well as their duration and global field power. This study shows that the current direction of monophasic pulses may modulate cortical sources contributing to TEP signals, activating neural populations and cortico-cortical paths more selectively. Biphasic stimulation reduces the variability associated with current direction and may be better suited when TMS targeting is blind to anatomical information.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Stimulation artifact correction method for estimation of early cortico-cortical evoked potentials
    Trebaul, Lena
    Rudrauf, David
    Job, Anne-Sophie
    Maliia, Mihai Dragos
    Popa, Irina
    Barborica, Andrei
    Minotti, Lorella
    Mindruta, Ioana
    Kahane, Philippe
    David, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2016, 264 : 94 - 102
  • [2] Effects of stimulation intensity on intracranial cortico-cortical evoked potentials: A titration study
    Hays, A. Mark
    Smith, J. Rachel
    Haridas, Babitha
    Coogan, Christopher
    Crone, E. Nathan
    Kang, Y. Joon
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (11) : 2766 - 2777
  • [3] Cortico-cortical evoked potentials in response to varying stimulation intensity improves seizure localization
    Hays, Mark A.
    Smith, Rachel J.
    Wang, Yujing
    Coogan, Christopher
    Sarma, Sridevi V.
    Crone, Nathan E.
    Kang, Joon Y.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 145 : 119 - 128
  • [4] Neuromonitoring of the language pathways using cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oleg Titov
    Andrey Bykanov
    David Pitskhelauri
    Gleb Danilov
    Neurosurgical Review, 2022, 45 : 1883 - 1894
  • [5] Quantifying volume conducted potential using stimulation artefact in cortico-cortical evoked potentials
    Prime, David
    Woolfe, Matthew
    O'Keefe, Steven
    Rowlands, David
    Dionisio, Sasha
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2020, 337
  • [6] Neuromonitoring of the language pathways using cortico-cortical evoked potentials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Titov, Oleg
    Bykanov, Andrey
    Pitskhelauri, David
    Danilov, Gleb
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2022, 45 (03) : 1883 - 1894
  • [7] Spatial-Temporal Functional Mapping Combined With Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials in Predicting Cortical Stimulation Results
    Wang, Yujing
    Hays, Mark A.
    Coogan, Christopher
    Kang, Joon Y.
    Flinker, Adeen
    Arya, Ravindra
    Korzeniewska, Anna
    Crone, Nathan E.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [8] Cortico-cortical evoked potentials of language tracts in minimally invasive glioma surgery guided by Penfield stimulation
    Seidel, Kathleen
    Wermelinger, Jonathan
    Alvarez-Abut, Pablo
    Deletis, Vedran
    Raabe, Andreas
    Zhang, David
    Schucht, Philippe
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 161 : 256 - 267
  • [9] Transfer Function Models for the Localization of Seizure Onset Zone From Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials
    Kamali, Golnoosh
    Smith, Rachel June
    Hays, Mark
    Coogan, Christopher
    Crone, Nathan E.
    Kang, Joon Y.
    Sarma, Sridevi V.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [10] Intrasulcal ECoG approach to cortico-cortical connectivity using electrical stimulation-induced evoked potentials in macaques
    Osada, Takahiro
    Molcard, Antoine J.
    Matsuo, Takeshi
    Kawasaki, Keisuke
    Adachi, Yusuke
    Miyamoto, Kentaro
    Watanabe, Tomomi
    Hasegawa, Isao
    Miyashita, Yasushi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2011, 71 : E97 - E97