Measurement of Bone Mineral Density in the Tunnel Regions for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Computed Tomography Scan, and the Immersion Technique Based on Archimedes' Principle

被引:12
|
作者
Tie, Kai [1 ]
Wang, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Liaobin [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Orthoped, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Provence, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TENDON GRAFT; FIXATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.053
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral tunnel was higher than that of the tibial tunnel, to provide objective evidence for choosing the appropriate diameter of interference screws. Methods: Two groups were enrolled. One group comprised 30 normal volunteers, and the other comprised 9 patients with ACL rupture. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure the BMD of the femoral and tibial tunnel regions of the volunteers' right knees by choosing a circular area covering the screw fixation region. The knees were also scanned by spiral computed tomography (CT), and the 3-dimensional reconstruction technique was used to determine the circular sections passing through the longitudinal axis of the femoral and tibial tunnels. Grayscale CT values of the cross-sectional area were measured. Cylindrical cancellous bone blocks were removed from the femoral and tibial tunnels during the ACL reconstruction for the patients. The volumetric BMD of the bone blocks was measured using a standardized immersion technique according to Archimedes' principle. Results: As measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the BMD of the femoral and tibial tunnel regions was 1.162 +/- 0.034 g/cm(2) and 0.814 +/- 0.038 g/cm(2), respectively (P < .01). The CT value of the femoral tunnel region was 211.7 +/- 11.5 Hounsfield units, and the value of the tibial tunnel region was 104.9 +/- 7.4 Hounsfield units (P < .01). The volumetric BMD of the bone block from the femoral tunnel (2.80 +/- 0.88 g/cm(3)) was higher than the value from the tibial tunnel (1.88 +/- 0.59 g/cm(3)) (P < .01). Comparing the data between male and female patients, we found no significant difference in both femoral and tibial tunnel regions. Conclusions: For ACL reconstruction, the BMD of the femoral tunnel is higher than that of the tibial tunnel. This implies that a proportionally larger-diameter interference screw should be used for fixation in the proximal tibia than that used for fixation in the distal femur.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography
    Andrew M. Briggs
    Egon Perilli
    Ian H. Parkinson
    Susan Kantor
    Tim V. Wrigley
    Nicola L. Fazzalari
    John D. Wark
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2012, 30 : 222 - 231
  • [42] MEASUREMENT OF ABDOMINAL AND VISCERAL FAT WITH COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    JENSEN, MD
    KANALEY, JA
    REED, JE
    SHEEDY, PF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1995, 61 (02): : 274 - 278
  • [43] COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN THE EVALUATION OF BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    Zakharov, I. S.
    Kolpinskiy, G. I.
    Shkaraburov, A. S.
    Popova, O. S.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 : S164 - S164
  • [44] Study of mandible bone mineral density of Chinese adults by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Li, N.
    Jing, H.
    Li, J.
    Zhou, F.
    Bu, L.
    Yang, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 40 (11) : 1275 - 1279
  • [45] Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry vs Computed Tomography: Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Predicting Postoperative Spinal Fusion Outcomes
    Vance, Awais
    Mazal, Alexander
    Aoun, Salah G.
    El Tecle, Najib
    Davies, Matthew Thomas
    El Ahmadieh, Tarek Youssef
    Morrill, Kevin C.
    Bagley, Carlos A.
    Al Tamimi, Mazin
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 124 - 124
  • [46] Comparison of Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Using Quantitative Computed Tomography and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in an Ovine Model of Osteoporosis
    Bisazza, Katie
    Nelson, Brad
    Sikes, Katie
    Stewart, Holly
    Easley, Jeremiah
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2023, 38 : 167 - 168
  • [47] A physical model for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density
    Sievänen, H
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (05) : 325 - 330
  • [48] Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    P. Tothill
    W. J. Hannan
    Osteoporosis International, 2007, 18 : 1515 - 1523
  • [49] Volumetric bone mineral density derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements
    Braillon, PM
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 20 (01) : 106 - 106
  • [50] Does the Precision of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Bone Mineral Density Differ by Sex?
    Krueger, Diane
    Vallarta-Ast, Nellie
    Libber, Jessie
    Gangnon, Ronald
    Binkley, Neil
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2014, 17 (04) : 505 - 509