Measurement of Bone Mineral Density in the Tunnel Regions for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Computed Tomography Scan, and the Immersion Technique Based on Archimedes' Principle

被引:12
|
作者
Tie, Kai [1 ]
Wang, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Chen, Liaobin [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Orthoped, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Provence, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TENDON GRAFT; FIXATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.053
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine, for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral tunnel was higher than that of the tibial tunnel, to provide objective evidence for choosing the appropriate diameter of interference screws. Methods: Two groups were enrolled. One group comprised 30 normal volunteers, and the other comprised 9 patients with ACL rupture. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure the BMD of the femoral and tibial tunnel regions of the volunteers' right knees by choosing a circular area covering the screw fixation region. The knees were also scanned by spiral computed tomography (CT), and the 3-dimensional reconstruction technique was used to determine the circular sections passing through the longitudinal axis of the femoral and tibial tunnels. Grayscale CT values of the cross-sectional area were measured. Cylindrical cancellous bone blocks were removed from the femoral and tibial tunnels during the ACL reconstruction for the patients. The volumetric BMD of the bone blocks was measured using a standardized immersion technique according to Archimedes' principle. Results: As measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the BMD of the femoral and tibial tunnel regions was 1.162 +/- 0.034 g/cm(2) and 0.814 +/- 0.038 g/cm(2), respectively (P < .01). The CT value of the femoral tunnel region was 211.7 +/- 11.5 Hounsfield units, and the value of the tibial tunnel region was 104.9 +/- 7.4 Hounsfield units (P < .01). The volumetric BMD of the bone block from the femoral tunnel (2.80 +/- 0.88 g/cm(3)) was higher than the value from the tibial tunnel (1.88 +/- 0.59 g/cm(3)) (P < .01). Comparing the data between male and female patients, we found no significant difference in both femoral and tibial tunnel regions. Conclusions: For ACL reconstruction, the BMD of the femoral tunnel is higher than that of the tibial tunnel. This implies that a proportionally larger-diameter interference screw should be used for fixation in the proximal tibia than that used for fixation in the distal femur.
引用
收藏
页码:1464 / 1471
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bone density measurements in children and adolescents - Quantitative computed tomography versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Pitukcheewanont, P
    Chen, P
    ENDOCRINOLOGIST, 2005, 15 (04): : 232 - 239
  • [32] Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine in Ambulatory Children with Cerebral Palsy by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography
    Wren, Tishya A. L.
    Liang, Adriana
    Bent, Melissa
    Kay, Robert
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2024, 39 : 317 - 317
  • [33] Bone mineral density measurements by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in HIV-infected children and adolescents
    Pitukcheewanont, P
    Safani, D
    Church, J
    Dunaway, T
    Liu, S
    Gilsanz, V
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 133A - 133A
  • [34] Bone mineral density and content: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry versus peripheral quantitative computed tomography
    Shedd, KM
    Hanson, KB
    Alekel, DL
    Hanson, LN
    Van Loan, MD
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (05): : A1062 - A1063
  • [35] MEASUREMENT OF LUMBAR SPINAL BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN PRETERM INFANTS BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    TSUKAHARA, H
    SUDO, M
    UMEZAKI, M
    FUJII, Y
    KURIYAMA, M
    YAMAMOTO, K
    ISHII, Y
    BIOLOGY OF THE NEONATE, 1993, 64 (2-3): : 96 - 103
  • [36] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around cemented and cementless femoral prosthesis
    Kabak, S
    Halici, M
    Karaoglu, S
    Baktir, A
    Kula, M
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : S73 - S73
  • [37] Slot-Scan Dual-Energy Measurement of Bone Mineral Density on a Robotic X-Ray System
    Zhao, C.
    Luckner, C.
    Herbst, M.
    Vogt, S.
    Ritschl, L.
    Kappler, S.
    Siewerdsen, J. H.
    Zbijewski, W.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312
  • [38] EVALUATION OF BONE MINERAL STATUS WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE
    Alan, Aydan Mutis
    Sezer, Zehra
    Dincer, Mevlut Tamer
    Oz, Ahmet
    Karaca, Cebrail
    Alagoz, Selma
    Guzel, Elif
    Gonen, Mustafa Sait
    Seyahi, Nurhan
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I634 - I635
  • [39] Comparison of Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual X-ray, Axial Dual-energy Photon X-ray Absorptiometry and Laser Absorptiometry of Calcaneus
    Forogh, B.
    Ghasemzadeh, A.
    Salimzadeh, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 30 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [40] Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography
    Briggs, Andrew M.
    Perilli, Egon
    Parkinson, Ian H.
    Kantor, Susan
    Wrigley, Tim V.
    Fazzalari, Nicola L.
    Wark, John D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2012, 30 (02) : 222 - 231