Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results

被引:16
|
作者
Berrios, Courtney [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [2 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [2 ]
Applegate, Carolyn D. [1 ]
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, 600 North Wolfe St,Blalock 1008, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Genomics research; Motivations; Expectations; Influence of provider; Genetic counseling; Return of results; GENETIC RESEARCH; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; SEQUENCING RESEARCH; CANCER; MOTIVATIONS; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; PARENTS; BIOBANK; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 273
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research
    McKinney, Ross E., Jr.
    Beskow, Laura M.
    Ford, Daniel E.
    Lantos, John D.
    McCall, Jonathan
    Patrick-Lake, Bray
    Pletcher, Mark J.
    Rath, Brian
    Schmidt, Hollie
    Weinfurt, Kevin
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (05) : 494 - 502
  • [32] Informed Consent Is Not the Major Ethical Issue in Clinical Research
    Meadow, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (12): : 24 - 24
  • [33] THE SOCIAL FILTER EFFECT OF INFORMED CONSENT IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    THONG, YH
    HARTH, SC
    PEDIATRICS, 1991, 87 (04) : 568 - 569
  • [34] Deontological problems in clinical research: The Informed Consent Document
    Tzavella, F. A.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2010, 27 (02): : 230 - 238
  • [35] Informed consent and the ethics of clinical research: Reply to commentaries
    Miller, FG
    Moreno, JD
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS, 2005, 16 (04): : 376 - 379
  • [36] Informed consent practices in clinical research: present and future
    Jawa, Natasha A.
    Boyd, J. Gordon
    Maslove, David M.
    Scott, Stephen H.
    Silver, Samuel A.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 99 (1175) : 1033 - 1042
  • [37] Clinical Research Coordinator Perceptions of the Informed Consent Process
    Towsley, Nyssa
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (03) : NP15 - NP16
  • [38] WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT - CLOSING THE DOOR TO CLINICAL RESEARCH
    NOBLE, MA
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 1985, 33 (06) : 292 - 293
  • [39] Consent and Informed Consent: Their Ongoing Evolutions in Clinical Care and Research on Humans
    Mazur, Dennis J.
    SOCIOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (01): : 253 - 267
  • [40] Return of results in translational iPS cell research: considerations for donor informed consent
    Lomax, Geoffrey P.
    Shepard, Kelly A.
    STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2013, 4