Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results

被引:16
|
作者
Berrios, Courtney [1 ]
James, Cynthia A. [2 ]
Raraigh, Karen [1 ]
Bollinger, Juli [3 ]
Murray, Brittney [2 ]
Tichnell, Crystal [2 ]
Applegate, Carolyn D. [1 ]
Bergner, Amanda L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, McKusick Nathans Inst Genet Med, 600 North Wolfe St,Blalock 1008, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Genomics research; Motivations; Expectations; Influence of provider; Genetic counseling; Return of results; GENETIC RESEARCH; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; SEQUENCING RESEARCH; CANCER; MOTIVATIONS; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; PARENTS; BIOBANK; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 273
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Informed Consent in clinical practice and medical research
    Santillan-Doherty, P
    Cabral-Castañeda, A
    Soto-Ramírez, L
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2003, 55 (03): : 322 - 338
  • [22] Informed consent in clinical research: The crisis in paediatrics
    Pierro, A
    Spitz, L
    LANCET, 1997, 349 (9066): : 1703 - 1703
  • [23] The Role of Informed Consent in Clinical and Research Settings
    Hariri, Essa
    Al Hammoud, Mazen
    Donovan, Erin
    Shah, Kevin
    Kittleson, Michelle M.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 106 (04) : 663 - 674
  • [24] Improving quality of informed consent in clinical research
    Bhatt, A.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2015, 61 (04) : 221 - 222
  • [25] A survey of clinical research investigators and clinical research coordinators about the process of informed consent
    Farber, NJ
    Castellano, J
    Leary-Prowse, J
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 : 167 - 167
  • [26] Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants' views and expectations about trial participation
    Tarrant, Carolyn
    Jackson, Clare
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    McNicol, Sarah
    Kenyon, Sara
    Armstrong, Natalie
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 2042 - 2053
  • [27] Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Fyer, Abby
    Klitzman, Robert L.
    Martinez, Josue
    Parens, Erik
    Zhang, Yuan
    Chung, Wendy K.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (08) : 644 - 650
  • [28] Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions?
    Christopher, Paul P.
    Garcia-Sampson, Lorena G.
    Stein, Michael
    Johnson, Jennifer
    Rich, Josiah
    Lidz, Charles
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2017, 47 (02) : 21 - 29
  • [29] Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research
    Facio, Flavia M.
    Sapp, Julie C.
    Linn, Amy
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2012, 5
  • [30] Approaches to informed consent for hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating clinical genomics research
    Flavia M Facio
    Julie C Sapp
    Amy Linn
    Leslie G Biesecker
    BMC Medical Genomics, 5