BIOMECHANICAL STRESS ANALYSIS OF BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE

被引:0
|
作者
Fanali, S. [1 ]
Tramonte, S. U. [1 ]
Brunelli, G. [2 ]
Carinci, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Oral Sci Nano & Biotechnol, Chieti, Italy
[2] Don Orione Inst, Dept Dent & Maxillofacial Surg, Bergamo, Italy
[3] Univ Ferrara, Sect Maxillofacial Surg, Dept DMCCC, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Over the last decade immediate load protocol has been revalued in the field of oral implantology with a view to achieve a simpler implantation protocol. This would lead to relevant advantages, such as a lower invasive impact of implantation and a shorter timing of treatment, with the patient regaining total masticatory functionality within the immediate post operative stage. In order to optimize the immediate load protocol and to foster implant osseointegration, the Italian Implantology School has developed soldering techniques by welding one or more stabilizing bars. Welding techniques allow obtaining a better primary stability in the early post-operatory period in comparison with non-supported implants, as micromovements are reduced and stress/strain distribution at bone-implant interface is more balanced. The present essay "Biomechanical stress analysis of bone-implant interface" is intended to study the distribution of stress/strain exerted by masticatory loads onto the pen-implant bone, with a view to decide whether the bar may be removed by completion of the healing process without relevant impact on bone strain. Secondly, it will be estimated whether the use of two bars undersized in diameter and symmetric to the implant can be compared with the application of one bar only. Finite Element analysis was performed. The results demonstrated that the use of a stiff definitive prosthesis (metal-porcelain) allows to remove the bar after 90 days' recovery, thus avoiding any cosmetic, hygienic and prosthetic contraindication.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of loading frequency on deformations at the bone-implant interface
    Xie, Shuqiao
    Manda, Krishnagoud
    Pankaj, Pankaj
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2019, 233 (12) : 1219 - 1225
  • [42] HISTOLOGY AT THE BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE IN CEMENTED AND NONCEMENTED ENDOPROSTHESES
    HERREN, T
    REMAGEN, W
    SCHENK, R
    ORTHOPADE, 1987, 16 (03): : 239 - 251
  • [44] Numerical Analysis of Biomechanical Response of a Dental Prosthesis with Regard to Bone-Implant Adhesion Phenomena
    Natali, Arturo N.
    Carniel, Emanuele L.
    Pavan, Piero G.
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (7-8) : 1187 - 1199
  • [45] Titania nanotubes for orchestrating osteogenesis at the bone-implant interface
    Gulati, Karan
    Maher, Shaheer
    Findlay, David M.
    Losic, Dusan
    NANOMEDICINE, 2016, 11 (14) : 1847 - 1864
  • [46] Ultrasonic Interferometric Procedure for Quantifying the Bone-Implant Interface
    Luetzelberger, Jan
    Arneth, Philipp
    Franck, Alexander
    Drese, Klaus Stefan
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (13)
  • [47] A nonlinear homogenized finite element analysis of the primary stability of the bone-implant interface
    Ovesy, Marzieh
    Voumard, Benjamin
    Zysset, Philippe
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2018, 17 (05) : 1471 - 1480
  • [48] Mechanical properties of bone-implant interface: Analysis of hydroxyapatite coatings of varying crystallinity
    Chang, YL
    Krizan, KE
    Stanford, CM
    Keller, JC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 1518 - 1518
  • [49] Neutron microtomography to investigate the bone-implant interface-comparison with histological analysis
    Guillaume, Florian
    Le Cann, Sophie
    Tengattini, Alessandro
    Tornquist, Elin
    Falentin-Daudre, Celine
    Albini Lomami, Hugues
    Petit, Yvan
    Isaksson, Hanna
    Haiat, Guillaume
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (10):
  • [50] Optical bone chambers as tools for studying the bone-implant interface: A review
    Winet, H
    CELLS AND MATERIALS, 1995, 5 (03): : 293 - 308