Is It Necessary to Free the Inferior Alveolar Nerve From the Proximal Segment in the Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

被引:19
|
作者
Susarla, Srinivas M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ettinger, Russell E. [1 ,2 ]
Dodson, Thomas B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Craniofacial Ctr, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Div Plast & Craniofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FUNCTIONAL SENSORY RECOVERY; RAMUS; GENIOPLASTY; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: When the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is contained within the proximal segment after a mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), conventional teaching is to release the nerve so that it freely enters the distal segment. However, manipulation of the IAN may cause further injury. The purpose of this study was to measure IAN neurosensory recovery in SSOs when the nerve was not freed from the proximal segment. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective split-mouth study of patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The sample was composed of patients who underwent a BSSO in which the IAN was intact bilaterally but freely entering the distal segment on one side (IANDI) and contained within the proximal segment on the other (IANPR). The outcome of interest was time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) of the IAN, measured in days. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. P <= .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty patients undergoing 40 SSOs were included as study patients. The sample's mean age was 19.0 +/- 2.4 years (range, 15 to 26 years); there were 13 female patients. Of these patients, 15 under-went BSSO whereas 5 underwent BSSO plus genioplasty. The planned mean composite 3-dimensional mandibular movements for IAN(DI) and IAN(PR) were 6.3 +/- 2.8 mm (range, 2.5 to 12.3 mm) and 6.3 +/- 2.3 mm (range, 2.7 to 10.8 mm), respectively (P = .96). All patients achieved FSR in the bilateral IAN distributions within 1 year of surgery (range, 34 to 284 days). The median times to FSR were 100 days for IAN(DI) and 101 days for IAN(PR) (P = .64). Conclusions: In patients undergoing SSOs, maintaining the IAN within the proximal segment of the mandible may not affect neurosensory recovery. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1388
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of the mandibular divergence on the position of the inferior alveolar nerve and mylohyoid nerve: a computed tomography study and its relevance to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Oth, Olivier
    Louryan, Stephane
    Jan, Serge Van Sint
    Rooze, Marcel
    Glineur, Regine
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2013, 35 (03) : 241 - 247
  • [42] Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations
    Westermark, A
    Bystedt, H
    von Konow, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 36 (06): : 429 - 433
  • [43] Impact of the mandibular divergence on the position of the inferior alveolar nerve and mylohyoid nerve: a computed tomography study and its relevance to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Olivier Oth
    Stéphane Louryan
    Serge Van Sint Jan
    Marcel Rooze
    Régine Glineur
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2013, 35 : 241 - 247
  • [44] Is injury to the inferior alveolar nerve still common during orthognathic surgery? Manual twist technique for sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Choi, Bong-Kyoon
    Lee, Won
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    Yang, Eun-Jung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (10): : 946 - 951
  • [45] Radiological evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve displacement after removal of impacted mandibular third molars prior to sagittal split osteotomy
    Bagourd, Thomas
    Varazzani, Andrea
    Dugast, Sophie
    Guyonvarc'h, Pierre
    Corre, Pierre
    Bertin, Helios
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (06)
  • [46] Genome-wide association study of sensory disturbances in the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kobayashi, Daisuke
    Nishizawa, Daisuke
    Takasaki, Yoshito
    Kasai, Shinya
    Kakizawa, Takashi
    Ikeda, Kazutaka
    Fukuda, Ken-ichi
    MOLECULAR PAIN, 2013, 9
  • [47] Discussion: Management of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve in Large Sagittal Advancements: To Free or Not?
    Lin, Cheng-Hui
    Wang, Po-Fang
    Chen, Ying-An
    Yao, Chuan-Fong
    Lu, Ting-Chen
    Chou, Pang-Yun
    Chang, Frank Chun-Shin
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    Chen, Yu-Ray
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (01) : 171 - 173
  • [48] Modified osteotome for inferior border sagittal split osteotomy
    Gil, Jose Nazareno
    Marin, Charles
    Paggi Claus, Jonathas Daniel
    Lima, Sergio Monteiro, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (09) : 1840 - 1842
  • [49] In Vitro Comparison of the Sagittal Split Osteotomy With and Without Inferior Border Osteotomy
    Boeckmann, Roland
    Schoen, Patrick
    Neuking, Klaus
    Meyns, Joeri
    Kessler, Peter
    Eggeler, Gunther
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (02) : 316 - 323
  • [50] NEW APPLIANCE FOR REPOSITIONING THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT DURING RIGID FIXATION OF THE SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY
    FUJIMURA, N
    NAGURA, H
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (09) : 1026 - 1027