Is It Necessary to Free the Inferior Alveolar Nerve From the Proximal Segment in the Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

被引:19
|
作者
Susarla, Srinivas M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ettinger, Russell E. [1 ,2 ]
Dodson, Thomas B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Craniofacial Ctr, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Div Plast & Craniofacial Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Sch Dent, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
FUNCTIONAL SENSORY RECOVERY; RAMUS; GENIOPLASTY; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: When the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is contained within the proximal segment after a mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (SSO), conventional teaching is to release the nerve so that it freely enters the distal segment. However, manipulation of the IAN may cause further injury. The purpose of this study was to measure IAN neurosensory recovery in SSOs when the nerve was not freed from the proximal segment. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective split-mouth study of patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The sample was composed of patients who underwent a BSSO in which the IAN was intact bilaterally but freely entering the distal segment on one side (IANDI) and contained within the proximal segment on the other (IANPR). The outcome of interest was time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) of the IAN, measured in days. Descriptive, bivariate, and Kaplan-Meier statistics were computed. P <= .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty patients undergoing 40 SSOs were included as study patients. The sample's mean age was 19.0 +/- 2.4 years (range, 15 to 26 years); there were 13 female patients. Of these patients, 15 under-went BSSO whereas 5 underwent BSSO plus genioplasty. The planned mean composite 3-dimensional mandibular movements for IAN(DI) and IAN(PR) were 6.3 +/- 2.8 mm (range, 2.5 to 12.3 mm) and 6.3 +/- 2.3 mm (range, 2.7 to 10.8 mm), respectively (P = .96). All patients achieved FSR in the bilateral IAN distributions within 1 year of surgery (range, 34 to 284 days). The median times to FSR were 100 days for IAN(DI) and 101 days for IAN(PR) (P = .64). Conclusions: In patients undergoing SSOs, maintaining the IAN within the proximal segment of the mandible may not affect neurosensory recovery. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1388
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Influence of Reduction Mandibuloplasty History on the Incidence of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury during Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Choi, Bong-Kyoon
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    Oh, Kap-Sung
    Yang, Eun-Jung
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (02) : 231E - 237E
  • [22] Mandibular nerve block can improve intraoperative inferior alveolar nerve visualization during sagittal split mandibular osteotomy
    Espitalier, Fabien
    Remerand, Francis
    Dubost, Annie-France
    Laffon, Marc
    Fusciardi, Jacques
    Goga, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 39 (03) : 164 - 168
  • [23] EVALUATING FUNCTION OF THE INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE WITH REPEATED NERVE-CONDUCTION TESTS DURING MANDIBULAR SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    JAASKELAINEN, SK
    PELTOLA, JK
    FORSSELL, K
    VAHATALO, K
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (03) : 269 - 279
  • [24] CONTROL OF THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT BY LOWER BORDER WIRING IN THE SAGITTAL SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    BOOTH, DF
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1981, 9 (02): : 126 - 128
  • [25] Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in monkeys: A comparison of monocortical and bicortical fixation
    Hu, J.
    Zhao, Q.
    Tang, J.
    Zheng, Z.
    Qi, M. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (04): : 265 - 271
  • [26] Influence of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure During Sagittal Split Osteotomy on the Rate and Timing of Baseline Sensory Recovery
    Abotaleb, Bassam M.
    Alkebsi, Khaled
    Jiang, Nan
    Bi, Ruiye
    Liu, Yao
    Telha, Wael
    Zhu, Songsong
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 80 (12) : 1893 - 1901
  • [27] Use of piezosurgery in calvarial bone grafts and for release of the inferior alveolar nerve in sagittal split osteotomy: technical note
    Nusrath, M. A.
    Postlethwaite, K. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 49 (08): : 668 - 669
  • [28] Recovery of inferior alveolar nerve injury after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO): a retrospective study
    Lee C.-H.
    Lee B.-S.
    Choi B.-J.
    Lee J.-W.
    Ohe J.-Y.
    Yoo H.-Y.
    Kwon Y.-D.
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 38 (1)
  • [29] Systematic review of the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of neurosensory disturbances
    Agbaje, J. O.
    Salem, A. S.
    Lambrichts, I.
    Jacobs, R.
    Politis, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 44 (04) : 447 - 451
  • [30] A NEW REPOSITIONING SYSTEM FOR THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT IN SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY OF THE MANDIBLE
    HARADA, K
    OKADA, Y
    NAGURA, H
    ENOMOTO, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 23 (02) : 71 - 73