Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

被引:6
|
作者
Papadopoulou, Marianna [1 ]
Stasi, Sophia [1 ]
Bakalidou, Daphne [1 ]
Papageorgiou, Effie [2 ]
Tsokani, Aristi [3 ]
Bratsi, Theodora [3 ]
Papathanasiou, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Physiotherapy Dept, Lab Neuromuscular & Cardiovasc Study Mot, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[2] Univ West Attica, Dept Biomed Sci, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[3] Univ West Attica, Dept Phys Therapy, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
关键词
Motor disability; 12; item-WHODAS; 2; 0; Psychometric properties; International classification of functioning; Disability and health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DAS-II; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; VERSION; SF-36; GREEK; RELIABILITY; ADAPTATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0-12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0-12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0-12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0-12Gr's internal consistency (Cronbach'sa), repeatability (Pearson'sr) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr).Reliability properties:WHODAS 2.0-12Gr Cronbach'sawas 0.814 (p < 0.001), Pearson'srvalue was 0.980 (p < 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985-0.993) (p < 0.001).Validity properties:Pearson's rvalues of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from -0.169 to -0.720. WHODAS 2.0-12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0-12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 819
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validating the 12-item proxy-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in young children with chronic physical illness in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Dol, Megan
    Basque, Dominique
    Elgie, Melissa
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3135 - 3142
  • [22] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Fujiwara, Aki
    Ida, Mitsuru
    Kimoto, Katsuhiro
    Watanabe, Keisuke
    Kawaguchi, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [23] Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada
    Ferro, Mark A.
    Elgie, Melissa
    Dol, Megan
    Basque, Dominique
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (19) : 3118 - 3124
  • [24] Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Bernard Sozański
    Hubert Kotarski
    Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska
    Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [25] Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Sozanski, Bernard
    Kotarski, Hubert
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [26] Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis
    Karsikas, Mika
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Juhola, Juhani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (04) : 276 - 281
  • [27] Correlation between Oswestry disability index and 12-item self-administered version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with chronic low back pain
    Barlund, Esa T.
    Katajapuu, Niina K.
    Paltamaa, Jaana P.
    Saltychev, Mikhail M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2021, 44 (02) : 170 - 172
  • [28] Proxy reliability of the 12-item world health organization disability assessment schedule II among adult patients with mental disorders
    Zhou, Wei
    Liu, Qian
    Yu, Yu
    Xiao, Shuiyuan
    Chen, Lizhang
    Khoshnood, Kaveh
    Zheng, Shimin
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (08) : 2219 - 2229
  • [29] Proxy reliability of the 12-item world health organization disability assessment schedule II among adult patients with mental disorders
    Wei Zhou
    Qian Liu
    Yu Yu
    Shuiyuan Xiao
    Lizhang Chen
    Kaveh Khoshnood
    Shimin Zheng
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 2219 - 2229
  • [30] Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) Within the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation for Serious Mental Illness
    Wojtalik, Jessica A.
    Kotwani, Anju
    Honarvar, Rochanne L.
    Eack, Shaun M.
    D'Angelo, Lori
    Whiting-Madison, Chrissy
    Brown, Wilson J.
    PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2024, 47 (03) : 229 - 239