Psychometric Properties of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in Adult Patients with Motor Disabilities

被引:6
|
作者
Papadopoulou, Marianna [1 ]
Stasi, Sophia [1 ]
Bakalidou, Daphne [1 ]
Papageorgiou, Effie [2 ]
Tsokani, Aristi [3 ]
Bratsi, Theodora [3 ]
Papathanasiou, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Attica, Physiotherapy Dept, Lab Neuromuscular & Cardiovasc Study Mot, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[2] Univ West Attica, Dept Biomed Sci, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
[3] Univ West Attica, Dept Phys Therapy, 28 Ag Spyridonos, Athens 12243, Greece
关键词
Motor disability; 12; item-WHODAS; 2; 0; Psychometric properties; International classification of functioning; Disability and health; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DAS-II; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; VERSION; SF-36; GREEK; RELIABILITY; ADAPTATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-019-09721-0
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
To explore the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0-12 item) in adult patients suffering from motor disabilities. The questionnaire of WHODAS 2.0-12 item was officially translated and cross-culturally adapted into Greek (WHODAS 2.0-12Gr).136 adult patients with motor disabilities included in the present observational study. A reliability study was carried out to explore WHODAS 2.0-12Gr's internal consistency (Cronbach'sa), repeatability (Pearson'sr) and test retest test-retest reliability between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr outcomes of day-1 and day-8 [intra-class correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (ICC 95%CI)], and the convergent validity (item-total correlation) of the questionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to explore the construct validity of the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr, while the concurrent validity of the questionnaire was testing against the Greek Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 1.0 (SF-36v1.0-Gr).Reliability properties:WHODAS 2.0-12Gr Cronbach'sawas 0.814 (p < 0.001), Pearson'srvalue was 0.980 (p < 0.001) and ICC (95%CI) was 0.990 (0.985-0.993) (p < 0.001).Validity properties:Pearson's rvalues of item-total correlation were ranged from 0.376 to 0.736. EFA extracted a 3-factor model. Regarding concurrent validity, the significant correlations between the WHODAS 2.0-12Gr and the SF36v1.0-Gr ranged from -0.169 to -0.720. WHODAS 2.0-12Gr showed significant high to excellent reliability and significant weak to strong validity properties. Overall, it can be suggested that WHODAS 2.0-12Gr could be a reliable and valid tool for assessing patients with motor disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 819
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Jessica J. Wong
    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
    Wouter De Groote
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Olatz Garin
    Montse Ferrer
    Àngels Pont Acuña
    Pierre Côté
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 31
  • [12] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Ma, Bernice Hua
    Chen, Gang
    Badji, Samia
    Petrie, Dennis
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 411 - 422
  • [13] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Bernice Hua Ma
    Gang Chen
    Samia Badji
    Dennis Petrie
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 411 - 422
  • [14] Measuring Disability in Consumers of mental health services - psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Ghana
    Badu, Eric
    Mitchell, Rebecca
    O'Brien, Anthony Paul
    Osei, Akwasi
    Rubin, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2021, 30 (05) : 1274 - 1288
  • [15] Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule
    Schiavolin, Silvia
    Ferroli, Paolo
    Acerbi, Francesco
    Brock, Stefano
    Broggi, Morgan
    Cusin, Alberto
    Schiariti, Marco
    Visintini, Sergio
    Quintas, Rui
    Leonardi, Matilde
    Raggi, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (03) : 267 - 270
  • [16] Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item Arabic World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a screening tool for Syrian refugees
    Akhtar, Aemal
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Morina, Naser
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    Bryant, Richard
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2021, 7 (06):
  • [17] Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Katajapuu, Niina
    Barlund, Esa
    Laimi, Katri
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (06) : 789 - 794
  • [18] Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic
    Aki Fujiwara
    Mitsuru Ida
    Katsuhiro Kimoto
    Keisuke Watanabe
    Masahiko Kawaguchi
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2021, 35 : 81 - 85
  • [19] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Lusine Vaganian
    Sonja Bussmann
    Maren Boecker
    Michael Kusch
    Hildegard Labouvie
    Alexander L. Gerlach
    Jan C. Cwik
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 2929 - 2938
  • [20] An item analysis according to the Rasch model of the German 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
    Vaganian, Lusine
    Bussmann, Sonja
    Boecker, Maren
    Kusch, Michael
    Labouvie, Hildegard
    Gerlach, Alexander L.
    Cwik, Jan C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (10) : 2929 - 2938