Comparison of Two Approaches to Modeling Atmospheric Aerosol Particle Size Distributions

被引:0
|
作者
Zdimal, Vladimir [1 ]
Brabec, Marek [2 ,3 ]
Wagner, Zdenek [4 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republic, Inst Chem Proc Fundamentals, Lab Aerosol Chem & Phys, CR-16502 Prague 6, Czech Republic
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Informat, Prague 10042 10, Czech Republic
[3] Inst Comp Sci, Dept Nonlinear Modeling, Prague 18207 8, Czech Republic
[4] Acad Sci Czech Republic, Inst Chem Proc Fundamentals, E Hala Lab Thermodynam, CR-16502 Prague 6, Czech Republic
关键词
Particle size distribution; Lognormal mixture; Semiparametric modeling; Nonparametric modeling; Gnostic theory of uncertain data;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper compares two approaches to modeling (smoothing) aerosol particle size distribution (particle counts for specified diameter intervals): i) the semiparametric approach based on a maximum likelihood fitting of lognormal (LN) mixtures at each time separately, followed by smoothing parameter tracks, ii) the nonparametric approach based on a kernel-like smoothing as an application of the gnostic theory of uncertain data. The specific advantages and disadvantages of both the serniparametric and nonparametric approaches are discussed and illustrated using real data containing a day-long time series of size spectra measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:392 / 410
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparisons between hydrated and dehydrated aerosol particle size distributions
    Liu, PSK
    Leaitch, WR
    Banic, CM
    NUCLEATION AND ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS 1996, 1996, : 530 - 533
  • [32] RETRIEVED AND MEASURED AEROSOL MASS SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS - A COMPARISON
    HITZENBERGER, R
    RIZZI, R
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1986, 25 (04): : 546 - 553
  • [33] An inverse modeling procedure to determine particle growth and nucleation rates from measured aerosol size distributions
    Verheggen, B.
    Mozurkewich, M.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 : 2927 - 2942
  • [34] Predicting Atmospheric Aerosol Size Distributions Using Mixture Density Networks
    Rudiger, Joshua J.
    deGrassie, John Stephen
    McBryde, Kevin
    Hammel, Stephen
    LASER COMMUNICATION AND PROPAGATION THROUGH THE ATMOSPHERE AND OCEANS IV, 2015, 9614
  • [35] Comparative study of elemental mass size distributions in urban atmospheric aerosol
    Salma, I
    Maenhaut, W
    Záray, G
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2002, 33 (02) : 339 - 356
  • [37] Integrated approaches to modeling the organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components
    Koo, BY
    Ansari, AS
    Pandis, SN
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (34) : 4757 - 4768
  • [38] EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS FOR MULTIMODAL ATMOSPHERIC PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS
    WILLEKE, K
    BROCKMANN, JE
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1977, 11 (10) : 995 - 999
  • [39] Atmospheric aerosols in suburb of Prague: The dynamics of particle size distributions
    Rimnacova, Daniela
    Zdimal, Vladimir
    Schwarz, Jaroslav
    Smolik, Jiri
    Rimnac, Martin
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2011, 101 (03) : 539 - 552
  • [40] Electrostatic forces alter particle size distributions in atmospheric dust
    Toth, Joseph R., III
    Rajupet, Siddharth
    Squires, Henry
    Volbers, Blaire
    Zhou, Jun
    Xie, Li
    Sankaran, R. Mohan
    Lacks, Daniel J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2020, 20 (05) : 3181 - 3190