Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation

被引:31
|
作者
Bradley, Brendon A. [1 ]
Lee, Dominic S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil Engn, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Math & Stat, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
关键词
Performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE); Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; First-order second-moment (FOSM) method; Loss estimation; Loss deaggregation;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper the efficacy of an approximate method of uncertainty propagation, known as the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, for use in seismic loss estimation is investigated. The governing probabilistic equations which define the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER)-based loss estimation methodology used are discussed, and the proposed locations to use the FOSM approximations identified. The justification for the use of these approximations is based on a significant reduction in computational time by not requiring direct numerical integration, and the fact that only the first two moments of the distribution are known. Via various examples it is shown that great care should be taken in the use of such approximations, particularly considering the large uncertainties that must be propagated in a seismic loss assessment. Finally, a complete loss assessment of a structure is considered to investigate in detail the location where significant approximation errors are incurred, where caution must be taken in the interpretation of the results, and the computational demand of the various alternatives. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 24
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation
    Baker, Jack W.
    Cornell, C. Allin
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (03) : 236 - 252
  • [2] Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods
    Baker, JW
    Cornell, CA
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 669 - 676
  • [3] Uncertainty Propagation of Earthquake Loss Estimation System On The Early Seismic Damage Evaluation
    Huang, Chi-Jan
    Chang, Che-hao
    Chang, Kuan-Yung
    2009 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 891 - +
  • [4] Comments on the accuracy of some approximate methods of evaluation of expanded uncertainty
    Turzeniecka, D
    METROLOGIA, 1999, 36 (02) : 113 - 116
  • [5] Uncertainty propagation methods in dioxin/furans emission estimation models
    Ripamonti, G.
    Lonati, G.
    Baraldi, P.
    Cadini, F.
    Zio, E.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2222 - 2229
  • [6] Estimation of aquifer dimensions from passive seismic signals with approximate wave propagation models
    Lahivaara, Timo
    Ward, Nicholas F. Dudley
    Huttunen, Tomi
    Koponen, Janne
    Kaipio, Jari P.
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (01)
  • [7] Estimation uncertainty for some common seismic fragility curve fitting methods
    Iervolino, Iunio
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 152
  • [8] Efficiency of uncertainty propagation methods for moment estimation of uncertain model outputs
    Mohammadi, Samira
    Cremaschi, Selen
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 166
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF DYNAMICAL ACCURACY FOR UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION
    Park, Inkwan
    Scheeres, Daniel J.
    Fujimoto, Kohei
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2013, PTS I-III, 2014, 150 : 933 - 958
  • [10] CRITERIA OF THE ACCURACY ESTIMATION FOR APPROXIMATE METHODS OF STANDARD S298 ENTHALPY CALCULATIONS
    KHRIPLOVICH, LM
    ZHURNAL FIZICHESKOI KHIMII, 1985, 59 (02): : 514 - 515