Accuracy of approximate methods of uncertainty propagation in seismic loss estimation

被引:31
|
作者
Bradley, Brendon A. [1 ]
Lee, Dominic S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Civil Engn, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Math & Stat, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
关键词
Performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE); Aleatory uncertainty; Epistemic uncertainty; First-order second-moment (FOSM) method; Loss estimation; Loss deaggregation;
D O I
10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper the efficacy of an approximate method of uncertainty propagation, known as the first-order second-moment (FOSM) method, for use in seismic loss estimation is investigated. The governing probabilistic equations which define the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER)-based loss estimation methodology used are discussed, and the proposed locations to use the FOSM approximations identified. The justification for the use of these approximations is based on a significant reduction in computational time by not requiring direct numerical integration, and the fact that only the first two moments of the distribution are known. Via various examples it is shown that great care should be taken in the use of such approximations, particularly considering the large uncertainties that must be propagated in a seismic loss assessment. Finally, a complete loss assessment of a structure is considered to investigate in detail the location where significant approximation errors are incurred, where caution must be taken in the interpretation of the results, and the computational demand of the various alternatives. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 24
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of transmission loss and its uncertainty
    Gerstoft, Peter
    Huang, Chen-Fen
    Hodgkiss, William
    ACOUSTIC SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR THE SHALLOW WATER ENVIRONMENT: INVERSION METHODS AND EXPERIMENTS, 2006, : 233 - +
  • [22] Seismic loss estimation by efficient simulation
    Franchin, P.
    Pinto, P. E.
    Schotanus, M. Ij.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 10 (31-44) : 31 - 44
  • [23] Covariance Propagation for the Uncertainty Estimation in Stereo Vision
    Di Leo, Giuseppe
    Liguori, Consolatina
    Paolillo, Alfredo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2011, 60 (05) : 1664 - 1673
  • [24] Uncertainty Estimation and Propagation in Accelerated MRI Reconstruction
    Fischer, Paul
    Thomas, K.
    Baumgartner, Christian F.
    UNCERTAINTY FOR SAFE UTILIZATION OF MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, UNSURE 2023, 2023, 14291 : 84 - 94
  • [25] Probabilistic model for accuracy estimation in approximate monodimensional analyses
    Dell'Aquila, Carlo
    Di Tria, Francesco
    Lefons, Ezio
    Tangorra, Filippo
    WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 2010, 9 (10): : 1075 - 1085
  • [27] Approximate methods for uncertainty analysis of water distribution systems
    Kang, D. S.
    Pasha, M. F. K.
    Lansey, K.
    URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2009, 6 (03) : 233 - 249
  • [28] Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment
    Groen, E. A.
    Heijungs, R.
    Bokkers, E. A. M.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 62 : 316 - 325
  • [29] EFFICIENCY OF UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING OUTPUT
    Mohammadi, Samira
    Cremaschi, Selen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER-AIDED PROCESS DESIGN, 2019, 47 : 487 - 492
  • [30] ON THE ACCURACY OF APPROXIMATE METHODS FOR ANALYZING CYLINDRICAL DIELECTRIC RESONATORS
    MONGIA, RK
    MICROWAVE JOURNAL, 1991, 34 (10) : 146 - &