Discussions and Misinformation About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Twitter Content

被引:7
|
作者
Sidani, Jaime E. [1 ]
Hoffman, Beth [1 ]
Colditz, Jason B. [2 ]
Wolynn, Riley [3 ]
Hsiao, Lily [3 ]
Chu, Kar-Hai [1 ]
Rose, Jason J. [4 ]
Shensa, Ariel [5 ]
Davis, Esa [2 ]
Primack, Brian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Social Dynam & Community Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Behav & Community Hlth Sci, 130 DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Kenneth P Dietrich Sch Arts & Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Duquesne Univ, John G Rangos Sr Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Adm & Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[6] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Fayetteville, AZ USA
关键词
COVID-19; coronavirus; e-cigarette; electronic nicotine delivery systems; Twitter; social media; misinformation; discussion; public health; communication; concern; severity; conspiracy; PUBLIC-HEALTH; AGREEMENT; CIGARETTE;
D O I
10.2196/26335
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Misinformation and conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing. Some of this may stem from early reports suggesting a lower risk of severe COVID-19 in nicotine users. Additionally, a common conspiracy is that the e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak of 2019 was actually an early presentation of COVID-19. This may have important public health ramifications for both COVID-19 control and ENDS use. Objective: Twitter is an ideal tool for analyzing real-time public discussions related to both ENDS and COVID-19. This study seeks to collect and classify Twitter messages ("tweets") related to ENDS and COVID-19 to inform public health messaging. Methods: Approximately 2.1 million tweets matching ENDS-related keywords were collected from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and were then filtered for COVID-19-related keywords, resulting in 67,321 original tweets. A 5% (n=3366) subsample was obtained for human coding using a systematically developed codebook. Tweets were coded for relevance to the topic and four overarching categories. Results: A total of 1930 (57.3%) tweets were coded as relevant to the research topic. Half (n=1008, 52.2%) of these discussed a perceived association between ENDS use and COVID-19 susceptibility or severity, with 42.4% (n=818) suggesting that ENDS use is associated with worse COVID-19 symptoms. One-quarter (n=479, 24.8%) of tweets discussed the perceived similarity/dissimilarity of COVID-19 and EVALI, and 13.8% (n=266) discussed ENDS use behavior. Misinformation and conspiracy theories were present throughout all coding categories. Conclusions: Discussions about ENDS use and COVID-19 on Twitter frequently highlight concerns about the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 for ENDS users; however, many contain misinformation and conspiracy theories. Public health messaging should capitalize on these concerns and amplify accurate Twitter messaging.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gendered COVID-19 discussions on Twitter: a Norwegian case
    Arora, Sanjana
    Debesay, Jonas
    Eslen-Ziya, Hande
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2024, 48 (02) : 425 - 437
  • [32] WHY DO PEOPLE USE ELECTRONIC NICOTINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS ( ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES)? A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TWITTER, 2012-2015
    Ayers, John
    Allem, Jon-Patrick
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S862 - S862
  • [33] Why do people use electronic nicotine delivery systems (electronic cigarettes)? A content analysis of Twitter, 2012-2015
    Ayers, John W.
    Leas, Eric C.
    Allem, Jon-Patrick
    Benton, Adrian
    Dredze, Mark
    Althouse, Benjamin M.
    Cruz, Tess B.
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [34] Misinformation About HPV Vaccine on Twitter: An Exploratory Content Analysis
    Putt, Mary
    Siegle, Lyndsay
    Cappella, Joseph
    Merchant, Raina
    Buttenheim, Alison
    Gonzalez-Hernandez, Graciela
    Kornides, Melanie L.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (12) : A19 - A19
  • [35] Twitter Misinformation Discourses About Vaping: Systematic Content Analysis
    Al-Rawi, Ahmed
    Blackwell, Breanna
    Zemenchik, Kiana
    Lee, Kelley
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [36] Understanding the Use of Images to Spread COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
    Wang Y.
    Ling C.
    Stringhini G.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2023, 7 (CSCW1)
  • [37] Negative COVID-19 Vaccine Information on Twitter: Content Analysis
    Yiannakoulias, Niko
    Darlington, J. Connor
    Slavik, Catherine E.
    Benjamin, Grant
    JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY, 2022, 2 (02):
  • [38] NUTRITION INFORMATION POST COVID-19: A TWITTER CONTENT ANALYSIS
    Tomar, Shagun
    Gupta, Manisha
    Rani, Madhu
    Shyam, Hari Shankar
    Ujjawal, Nishtha
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [39] Sentiment Analysis on Twitter About COVID-19 Vaccination in Mexico
    Bernal, Claudia
    Bernal, Miguel
    Noguera, Andrei
    Ponce, Hiram
    Avalos-Gauna, Edgar
    ADVANCES IN SOFT COMPUTING (MICAI 2021), PT II, 2021, 13068 : 96 - 107
  • [40] Shifting social media influences: Discussions about mechanical ventilation on Twitter during COVID-19
    Patel, Vishal R.
    Gereta, Sofia
    Blanton, Christopher J.
    Mackert, Michael
    Nortje, Nico
    Moriates, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 67 : 191 - 192