Discussions and Misinformation About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and COVID-19: Qualitative Analysis of Twitter Content

被引:7
|
作者
Sidani, Jaime E. [1 ]
Hoffman, Beth [1 ]
Colditz, Jason B. [2 ]
Wolynn, Riley [3 ]
Hsiao, Lily [3 ]
Chu, Kar-Hai [1 ]
Rose, Jason J. [4 ]
Shensa, Ariel [5 ]
Davis, Esa [2 ]
Primack, Brian [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Social Dynam & Community Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Behav & Community Hlth Sci, 130 DeSoto St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Kenneth P Dietrich Sch Arts & Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Duquesne Univ, John G Rangos Sr Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Adm & Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[6] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Fayetteville, AZ USA
关键词
COVID-19; coronavirus; e-cigarette; electronic nicotine delivery systems; Twitter; social media; misinformation; discussion; public health; communication; concern; severity; conspiracy; PUBLIC-HEALTH; AGREEMENT; CIGARETTE;
D O I
10.2196/26335
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Misinformation and conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are increasing. Some of this may stem from early reports suggesting a lower risk of severe COVID-19 in nicotine users. Additionally, a common conspiracy is that the e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak of 2019 was actually an early presentation of COVID-19. This may have important public health ramifications for both COVID-19 control and ENDS use. Objective: Twitter is an ideal tool for analyzing real-time public discussions related to both ENDS and COVID-19. This study seeks to collect and classify Twitter messages ("tweets") related to ENDS and COVID-19 to inform public health messaging. Methods: Approximately 2.1 million tweets matching ENDS-related keywords were collected from March 1, 2020, through June 30, 2020, and were then filtered for COVID-19-related keywords, resulting in 67,321 original tweets. A 5% (n=3366) subsample was obtained for human coding using a systematically developed codebook. Tweets were coded for relevance to the topic and four overarching categories. Results: A total of 1930 (57.3%) tweets were coded as relevant to the research topic. Half (n=1008, 52.2%) of these discussed a perceived association between ENDS use and COVID-19 susceptibility or severity, with 42.4% (n=818) suggesting that ENDS use is associated with worse COVID-19 symptoms. One-quarter (n=479, 24.8%) of tweets discussed the perceived similarity/dissimilarity of COVID-19 and EVALI, and 13.8% (n=266) discussed ENDS use behavior. Misinformation and conspiracy theories were present throughout all coding categories. Conclusions: Discussions about ENDS use and COVID-19 on Twitter frequently highlight concerns about the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 for ENDS users; however, many contain misinformation and conspiracy theories. Public health messaging should capitalize on these concerns and amplify accurate Twitter messaging.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning in Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
    Alenezi, Mohammed N.
    Alqenaei, Zainab M.
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [22] Sentiment Analysis of Finnish Twitter Discussions on COVID-19 During the Pandemic
    Claes M.
    Farooq U.
    Salman I.
    Teern A.
    Isomursu M.
    Halonen R.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (2)
  • [23] A thematic analysis of UK COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy discussions on Twitter
    Jameel, Reeshma
    Greenfield, Sheila
    Lavis, Anna
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [24] Are Mutated Misinformation More Contagious? A Case Study of COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter
    Yan, Muheng
    Lin, Yu-Ru
    Chung, Wen-Ting
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE, WEBSCI 2022, 2022, : 336 - 347
  • [25] COVID-19 and Vitamin D Misinformation on YouTube: Content Analysis
    Quinn, Emma K.
    Fenton, Shelby
    Ford-Sahibzada, Chelsea A.
    Harper, Andrew
    Marcon, Alessandro R.
    Caulfield, Timothy
    Fazel, Sajjad S.
    Peters, Cheryl E.
    JMIR INFODEMIOLOGY, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [26] Dissemination of Misinformation About COVID-19 on TikTok: A Multimodal Analysis
    Patel, Kesha A.
    Thakur, Nirmalya
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2024 POSTERS, PT VI, HCII 2024, 2024, 2119 : 109 - 120
  • [27] Cyberdiscussions on twitter about delivery by venezuelan migrants in times of covid-19
    Lovon, Marco
    Garcia, Andrea Cabel
    POLITICA Y SOCIEDAD, 2023, 60 (01):
  • [28] A qualitative content analysis of cannabis-related discussions on Reddit during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Reygaerts, Hannah
    Smith, Sidney
    Renner, Lynette M.
    Ruiz, Yumary
    Schwab-Reese, Laura M.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [29] Twitter discussions on breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Jagarapu, Jawahar
    Diaz, Marlon I.
    Lehmann, Christoph U.
    Medford, Richard J.
    INTERNATIONAL BREASTFEEDING JOURNAL, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [30] Twitter discussions on breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Jawahar Jagarapu
    Marlon I. Diaz
    Christoph U. Lehmann
    Richard J. Medford
    International Breastfeeding Journal, 18