Determination of gallium and indium by solution cathode glow discharge as an excitation source for atomic emission spectrometry

被引:14
|
作者
Yu, Jie [1 ]
Kang, Yuejing [1 ]
Lu, Quanfang [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Hui [1 ]
Cui, Lijuan [1 ]
Lu, Zhuanhong [1 ]
Li, Juanlong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Chem & Chem Engn, Key Lab Bioelectrochem & Environm Anal Gansu Prov, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest Normal Univ, Editorial Dept Univ Journal, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Atomic emission spectrometry (AES); Determination; Gallium; Indium; Solution cathode glow discharge (SCGD); DIELECTRIC-BARRIER DISCHARGE; FLOWING ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTIONS; ATMOSPHERIC-PRESSURE; LIQUID CATHODE; WATER SAMPLES; ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE; RAPID-DETERMINATION; ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS; HEAVY-METALS; ANODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sab.2020.105968
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
In this paper, gallium (Ga) and indium (In) in water samples were determined by atomic emission spectrometry (AES) with solution cathode glow discharge (SCGD) as an excitation source. The optimal working conditions for the detection of Ga and In by proposed method are 660 V discharge voltage, 3.0 mL min(-1) solution flow rate and pH = 1.0 HNO3 as supporting electrolyte. Under these conditions, it is found that there are no obvious inter-ferences from most of the foreign ions when they exist in 20-fold excess over the In. But for Ga, the interferences from foreign ions are severe. The linear correlation coefficient (R-2) is better than 0.99 with a range of 1-40 mu g mL(-1) for Ga and 0.1-30 mu g mL(-1) for In. The limits of detection (LODs) for Ga and In are 0.10 and 0.016 mu g mL(-1), respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) are 2.9% for Ga and 3.9% for In, and the power is below 55 W. To validate the utility and accuracy of the proposed system, two water samples spiked with various concentration (0.3-20 mu g mL(-1)) of Ga and In are directly determined, and the measured results are only in good agreement with spiked values of In. After diluted 10 times for water samples, the spiked values (0.3-20 mu g mL(-1)) of Ga agree well with the measured value, suggesting that the matrix can interfere with the determination of Ga. The satisfactory recoveries between 90% and 109% of In and Ga are achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity improvement of solution cathode glow discharge-atomic emission spectrometry by using refrigerating anodes for optical determination of metal elements
    Zheng, Peichao
    Luo, Yuanjiang
    Wang, Jinmei
    Hu, Qiang
    Yang, Yang
    Mao, Xuefeng
    Lai, Chunhong
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2021, 36 (06) : 1228 - 1234
  • [22] Determination of gold in precious alloys by glow discharge atomic emission spectrometry
    Senofonte, O
    Caroli, S
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2000, 15 (07) : 869 - 872
  • [23] Determination of gold in precious alloys by glow discharge atomic emission spectrometry
    Senofonte, Oreste, 1600, Royal Soc of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom (15):
  • [24] Analysis of metal elements by solution cathode glow discharge-atomic emission spectrometry with a modified pulsation damper
    Wang, Jinmei
    Tang, Pengfei
    Zheng, Peichao
    Zhai, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2017, 32 (10) : 1925 - 1931
  • [25] Comparison in the analytical performance between krypton and argon glow discharge plasmas as the excitation source for atomic emission spectrometry
    Kazuaki Wagatsuma
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2009, 393 : 2067 - 2074
  • [26] Comparison in the analytical performance between krypton and argon glow discharge plasmas as the excitation source for atomic emission spectrometry
    Wagatsuma, Kazuaki
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 393 (08) : 2067 - 2074
  • [27] Evaluation of liquid cathode glow discharge-atomic emission spectrometry for determination of copper and lead in ores samples
    Yu, Jie
    Yang, Shuxiu
    Lu, Quanfang
    Sun, Duixiong
    Zheng, Jidong
    Zhang, Xiaomin
    Wang, Xing
    Yang, Wu
    TALANTA, 2017, 164 : 216 - 221
  • [28] New techniques for controlling the excitation source in glow discharge optical emission spectrometry
    Wagatsuma, K
    BUNSEKI KAGAKU, 2003, 52 (06) : 393 - 403
  • [29] Ultrasensitive determination of mercury by solution anode glow discharge atomic emission spectrometry coupled with hydride generation
    Mingli Yuan
    Xiaoxu Peng
    Fen Ge
    Mingyue Zhao
    Qing Li
    Zheng Wang
    ChineseChemicalLetters, 2020, 31 (10) : 2814 - 2818
  • [30] Ultrasensitive determination of mercury by solution anode glow discharge atomic emission spectrometry coupled with hydride generation
    Yuan, Mingli
    Peng, Xiaoxu
    Ge, Fen
    Zhao, Mingyue
    Li, Qing
    Wang, Zheng
    CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS, 2020, 31 (10) : 2814 - 2818