Optimizing the affinity and specificity of ligand binding with the inclusion of solvation effect

被引:12
|
作者
Yan, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Changchun Inst Appl Chem, State Key Lab Electroanalyt Chem, Changchun 130022, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Chem & Phys, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
solvation energy; scoring function; protein-ligand binding; binding affinity; binding specificity; SPA; PROTEIN-PROTEIN RECOGNITION; ACCESSIBLE SURFACE-AREAS; OUT CROSS-VALIDATION; SCORING FUNCTIONS; COMPUTATIONAL REDESIGN; MEAN FORCE; FREE-ENERGIES; SOLVENT; PREDICTION; COMPLEXES;
D O I
10.1002/prot.24848
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Solvation effect is an important factor for protein-ligand binding in aqueous water. Previous scoring function of protein-ligand interactions rarely incorporates the solvation model into the quantification of protein-ligand interactions, mainly due to the immense computational cost, especially in the structure-based virtual screening, and nontransferable application of independently optimized atomic solvation parameters. In order to overcome these barriers, we effectively combine knowledge-based atom-pair potentials and the atomic solvation energy of charge-independent implicit solvent model in the optimization of binding affinity and specificity. The resulting scoring functions with optimized atomic solvation parameters is named as specificity and affinity with solvation effect (SPA-SE). The performance of SPA-SE is evaluated and compared to 20 other scoring functions, as well as SPA. The comparative results show that SPA-SE outperforms all other scoring functions in binding affinity prediction and native pose identification. Our optimization validates that solvation effect is an important regulator to the stability and specificity of protein-ligand binding. The development strategy of SPA-SE sets an example for other scoring function to account for the solvation effect in biomolecular recognitions. Proteins 2015; 83:1632-1642. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1632 / 1642
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of ligand torsion number on the AutoDock mediated prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity
    Sriramulu, Dinesh Kumar
    Wu, Sangwook
    Lee, Sun-Gu
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 2020, 83 : 359 - 365
  • [22] Entropy and Mg2+ control ligand affinity and specificity in the malachite green binding RNA aptamer
    Da Costa, Jason Bernard
    Dieckmann, Thorsten
    MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2011, 7 (07) : 2156 - 2163
  • [23] Heme group ligand affinity and specificity in β,δ-diazamesoheme myoglobin
    Leininger, RR
    Brucker, EA
    Neya, S
    Olson, JS
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 76 (01) : A423 - A423
  • [24] BINDING SPECIFICITY AND AFFINITY OF ACRIFLAVINE FOR NUCLEIC ACIDS
    ROTH, D
    LONDON, M
    MANJON, M
    STAIN TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 42 (03): : 125 - &
  • [25] Binding affinity and specificity from computational studies
    Lazaridis, T
    CURRENT ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2002, 6 (14) : 1319 - 1332
  • [26] The role of disorder in RNA binding affinity and specificity
    Ottoz, Diana S. M.
    Berchowitz, Luke E.
    OPEN BIOLOGY, 2020, 10 (12)
  • [27] EFFECT OF CONFORMATIONAL FLEXIBILITY AND SOLVATION ON RECEPTOR-LIGAND BINDING FREE-ENERGIES
    VAJDA, S
    WENG, ZP
    ROSENFELD, R
    DELISI, C
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 33 (47) : 13977 - 13988
  • [28] SPA-LN: a scoring function of ligand-nucleic acid interactions via optimizing both specificity and affinity
    Yan, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Jin
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (12)
  • [29] Predicting solvent effects on antibody binding affinity by scrutinizing solvation at the binding interface
    Vagenende, Vincent
    Trout, Bernhardt L.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [30] Effect of Ligand Binding Affinity and Receptor Density in Relation to Biology of Retargeted Viruses
    Hasegawa, Kosei
    Nakamura, Takafumi
    Marks, James D.
    Russell, Stephen J.
    Peng, Kah-Whye
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 : S369 - S369