The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:91
|
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Pevzner, Mikhail
    Xin, Xiangang
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2019, 50 (01) : 83 - 110
  • [42] Eco-innovation and openness: Mapping the growth trajectories and the knowledge structure of open eco-innovation
    Sanni, Maruf
    Verdolini, Elena
    SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2022, 4
  • [43] Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership
    Jeong-Bon Kim
    Mikhail Pevzner
    Xiangang Xin
    Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50 : 83 - 110
  • [44] Is Institutional Ownership Socially Responsible? Perspectives from Heterogeneity and Stability of Institutional Ownership
    Potharla, Srikanth
    Mahapatra, Sushanta Kumar
    Turubilli, Surya Kumari
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2023,
  • [45] Eco-Innovation Maturity Model: A Framework to Support the Evolution of Eco-Innovation Integration in Companies
    Xavier, Amanda
    Reyes, Tatiana
    Aoussat, Ameziane
    Luiz, Leandro
    Souza, Lucas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [46] Innovation and ownership variety
    Wright, Mike
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 19 (01): : 74 - 79
  • [47] ECO-INNOVATION IN THE VALUE CHAIN
    McAloone, T. C.
    Mougaard, K.
    Restrepo, J.
    Knudsen, S.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE (DESIGN 2010), VOL 1-3, 2010, : 855 - 864
  • [48] Eco-innovation and Sustainable Development
    Ilic, Silvana
    Petrovic, Tanja
    Djukic, Gordana
    PROBLEMY EKOROZWOJU, 2022, 17 (02): : 197 - 203
  • [49] Patents as a measure for eco-innovation
    Oltra, Vanessa
    Kemp, Rene
    de Vries, Frans P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 13 (02) : 130 - 148
  • [50] Innovation and Foreign Ownership
    Guadalupe, Maria
    Kuzmina, Olga
    Thomas, Catherine
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07): : 3594 - 3627