The effect of institutional ownership and ownership dispersion on eco-innovation

被引:91
|
作者
Garcia-Sanchez, Isabel-Maria [1 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Cristina [2 ]
Aibar-Guzman, Beatriz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salamanca, IME Inst Multidisciplinar Empresa, Campus Miguel de Unamuno,Edificio FES, Salamanca 37007, Spain
[2] Univ Santiago Compostela, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Av Burgo S-N, Santiago De Compostela 15782, Spain
关键词
Eco-innovation; Institutional ownership; Ownership dispersion; Corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; GREEN INNOVATION; PANEL-DATA; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; FIRM; GOVERNANCE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to determine the role that the different institutional investors play in promoting eco-innovation, focusing on the analysis of the corrective or enhancing effect that can be derived from ownership dispersion related to the participation in a company's stock capital of institutional investors with different time horizons. The results obtained for a sample of 6,454 companies for the period 2002-2017 show the convergence of the short-term institutional investors' interests with the long-term institutional investors' demands, which has a positive effect on the implementation of proactive environmental strategies, such as eco-innovation. Additionally, this positive effect is enhanced by disperse ownership structures associated with the participation in a company's stock capital of both types of institutional investors, thereby increasing the firm's commitment to environmental sustainability. Although financial institutions and pension funds diverge from this long-term orientation, seeking an immediate economic return, ownership dispersion allows for correcting their individual negative effect on eco-innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Green innovation peer effects in common institutional ownership networks
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Li, Yumin
    Feng, Chong
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (02) : 641 - 660
  • [32] Assessing the Eco-Innovation Performance By Means of Eco-Innovation Index: Case of Slovakia
    Lesakova, Lubica
    Laco, Peter
    EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 726 - 736
  • [33] The moderation of institutional mimicry on eco-innovation performance: evidence from Brazil
    da Silva, Jose Jaconias
    Silva Cirani, Claudia Brito
    Alves Dias, Helison Bertoli
    de Lima, Ana Maria
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE INOVACAO, 2022, 21
  • [34] Does common institutional ownership promote ambidextrous innovation in firms?
    Zhiying Liu
    Mingfen Sun
    Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2024, 6 (4): : 371 - 384
  • [35] The effect of financial reporting quality on institutional ownership
    Gopikumar, V
    Nair, Smitha
    Sisodia, Gyanendra Singh
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (15) : 2020 - 2023
  • [36] Effects of institutional ownership
    Hayashi, AM
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 45 (01) : 6 - 7
  • [37] Institutional ownership and governance
    Franks, Julian
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2020, 36 (02) : 258 - 274
  • [38] Institutional ownership and conservatism
    Ramalingegowda, Santhosh
    Yu, Yong
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (1-2): : 98 - 114
  • [39] Eco-innovation Performance in Slovakia: Assessment Based on ABC Analysis of Eco-innovation Indicators
    Loucanova, Erika
    Nosalova, Martina
    BIORESOURCES, 2020, 15 (03): : 5355 - 5365
  • [40] ECO-INNOVATION IN SUSTAINABILITY TRANSFORMATION AND INTERNAL COMPANY DYNAMICS TRIGGERING ECO-INNOVATION DECISIONS
    Yurdakul, Melek
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI IKTISADI VE IDARI BILIMLER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 14 (28): : 709 - 733