Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions

被引:25
|
作者
Riedl, Rene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Business & Management, Digital Business Inst, Wehrgrabengasse 1-3, A-4400 Steyr, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Business Informat Informat Engn, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Big Five traits; Machine learning (ML); Personality; Review; Trust; Trust propensity; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE RESEARCH; EXTERNAL CONTROL; 5-FACTOR MODEL; DESIGN SCIENCE; SELF-EFFICACY; AUTOMATION; ACCEPTANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00594-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to technologies which support the execution of tasks normally requiring human intelligence (e.g., visual perception, speech recognition, or decision-making). Examples for AI systems are chatbots, robots, or autonomous vehicles, all of which have become an important phenomenon in the economy and society. Determining which AI system to trust and which not to trust is critical, because such systems carry out tasks autonomously and influence human-decision making. This growing importance of trust in AI systems has paralleled another trend: the increasing understanding that user personality is related to trust, thereby affecting the acceptance and adoption of AI systems. We developed a framework of user personality and trust in AI systems which distinguishes universal personality traits (e.g., Big Five), specific personality traits (e.g., propensity to trust), general behavioral tendencies (e.g., trust in a specific AI system), and specific behaviors (e.g., adherence to the recommendation of an AI system in a decision-making context). Based on this framework, we reviewed the scientific literature. We analyzed N = 58 empirical studies published in various scientific disciplines and developed a "big picture" view, revealing significant relationships between personality traits and trust in AI systems. However, our review also shows several unexplored research areas. In particular, it was found that prescriptive knowledge about how to design trustworthy AI systems as a function of user personality lags far behind descriptive knowledge about the use and trust effects of AI systems. Based on these findings, we discuss possible directions for future research, including adaptive systems as focus of future design science research.
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2051
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Artificial Intelligence for Management of Variable Renewable Energy Systems: A Review of Current Status and Future Directions
    Yousef, Latifa A.
    Yousef, Hibba
    Rocha-Meneses, Lisandra
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (24)
  • [42] Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions
    Lewicki, Roy J.
    Tomlinson, Edward C.
    Gillespie, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (06) : 991 - 1022
  • [43] Current Challenges and Future Research Directions in Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence
    Rodis, Nikolaos
    Sardianos, Christos
    Papadopoulos, Georgios Th.
    ERCIM NEWS, 2023, (134):
  • [44] Artificial intelligence in healthcare services: past, present and future research directions
    W. Shabeena Shah
    Zakaria Elkhwesky
    K. Mohamed Jasim
    Esraa Fayez Youssif Elkhwesky
    Fady Fayez Youssif Elkhwesky
    Review of Managerial Science, 2024, 18 (3) : 941 - 963
  • [45] Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Study and Directions for Future Research
    Wu, Chieh-Chen
    Islam, Md. Mohaimenul
    Poly, Tahmina Nasrin
    Weng, Yung-Ching
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [46] Artificial intelligence in healthcare services: past, present and future research directions
    Shah, W. Shabeena
    Elkhwesky, Zakaria
    Jasim, K. Mohamed
    Elkhwesky, Esraa Fayez Youssif
    Elkhwesky, Fady Fayez Youssif
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (03) : 941 - 963
  • [47] Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: Definitions, current research, and future directions
    George, Rose S.
    Htoo, Arkar
    Cheng, Michael
    Masterson, Timothy M.
    Huang, Kun
    Adra, Nabil
    Kaimakliotis, Hristos Z.
    Akgul, Mahmut
    Cheng, Liang
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (06) : 262 - 270
  • [48] Artificial intelligence for decision support systems in the field of operations research: review and future scope of research
    Gupta, Shivam
    Modgil, Sachin
    Bhattacharyya, Samadrita
    Bose, Indranil
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 308 (1-2) : 215 - 274
  • [49] Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions
    Frosolini, Andrea
    Franz, Leonardo
    Caragli, Valeria
    Genovese, Elisabetta
    de Filippis, Cosimo
    Marioni, Gino
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (22)
  • [50] Artificial intelligence in the field of nanofluids: A review on applications and potential future directions
    Bahiraei, Mehdi
    Heshmatian, Saeed
    Moayedi, Hossein
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 353 : 276 - 301