Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions

被引:25
|
作者
Riedl, Rene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Business & Management, Digital Business Inst, Wehrgrabengasse 1-3, A-4400 Steyr, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Business Informat Informat Engn, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Big Five traits; Machine learning (ML); Personality; Review; Trust; Trust propensity; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE RESEARCH; EXTERNAL CONTROL; 5-FACTOR MODEL; DESIGN SCIENCE; SELF-EFFICACY; AUTOMATION; ACCEPTANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00594-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to technologies which support the execution of tasks normally requiring human intelligence (e.g., visual perception, speech recognition, or decision-making). Examples for AI systems are chatbots, robots, or autonomous vehicles, all of which have become an important phenomenon in the economy and society. Determining which AI system to trust and which not to trust is critical, because such systems carry out tasks autonomously and influence human-decision making. This growing importance of trust in AI systems has paralleled another trend: the increasing understanding that user personality is related to trust, thereby affecting the acceptance and adoption of AI systems. We developed a framework of user personality and trust in AI systems which distinguishes universal personality traits (e.g., Big Five), specific personality traits (e.g., propensity to trust), general behavioral tendencies (e.g., trust in a specific AI system), and specific behaviors (e.g., adherence to the recommendation of an AI system in a decision-making context). Based on this framework, we reviewed the scientific literature. We analyzed N = 58 empirical studies published in various scientific disciplines and developed a "big picture" view, revealing significant relationships between personality traits and trust in AI systems. However, our review also shows several unexplored research areas. In particular, it was found that prescriptive knowledge about how to design trustworthy AI systems as a function of user personality lags far behind descriptive knowledge about the use and trust effects of AI systems. Based on these findings, we discuss possible directions for future research, including adaptive systems as focus of future design science research.
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2051
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence in agricultural value chain: review and future directions
    Ganeshkumar, C.
    Jena, Sanjay Kumar
    Sivakumar, A.
    Nambirajan, T.
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2023, 13 (03) : 379 - 398
  • [32] Artificial Intelligence Trust, Risk and Security Management (AI TRiSM): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions
    Habbal, Adib
    Ali, Mohamed Khalif
    Abuzaraida, Mustafa Ali
    Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 240
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence Trust, Risk and Security Management (AI TRiSM): Frameworks, applications, challenges and future research directions
    Habbal, Adib
    Ali, Mohamed Khalif
    Abuzaraida, Mustafa Ali
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 240
  • [34] A Review of Empirical Capital Structure Research and Directions for the Future
    Graham, John R.
    Leary, Mark T.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, VOL 3, 2011, 3 : 309 - 345
  • [35] A systematic review of research on artificial intelligence in higher education: Practice, gaps, and future directions in the GCC
    Fadlelmula, Fatma Kayan
    Qadhi, Saba Mansoon
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICE, 2024, 21 (06):
  • [36] A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions
    Lacity, Mary C.
    Khan, Shaji
    Yan, Aihua
    Willcocks, Leslie P.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (04) : 395 - 433
  • [37] The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: a systematic literature review and future research directions
    Alkhanbouli, Razan
    Almadhaani, Hour Matar Abdulla
    Alhosani, Farah
    Simsekler, Mecit Can Emre
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [38] The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions
    Borges, Aline F. S.
    Laurindo, Fernando J. B.
    Spinola, Mauro M.
    Goncalves, Rodrigo F.
    Mattos, Claudia A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 57
  • [39] Artificial intelligence and value co-creation: a review, conceptual framework and directions for future research
    Chandra, Baby
    Rahman, Zillur
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 34 (01) : 7 - 32
  • [40] The future of office and administrative support occupations in the era of artificial intelligence: A state of the art review and future research directions
    Pennathur, Priyadarshini R.
    Boksa, Valerie
    Pennathur, Arunkumar
    Kusiak, Andrew
    Livingston, Beth A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2024, 104