Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism

被引:47
|
作者
Paeng, Jun-Young [1 ]
Hong, Jongrak [1 ]
Kim, Chang-Soo [1 ]
Kim, Myung-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Mandibular prognathism; Resorbable screw; Titanium screw; POLY-L-LACTIDE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MINIPLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS; METALLIC PLATES; SHEEP; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Resorbable screw fixation for orthognathic surgery is widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery and has several advantages. However, surgeons are concerned about using resorbable screws in orthognathic surgery because of possible postoperative complications such as relapse, screw fracture, and infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of bicortical resorbable screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular prognathism. Materials and methods: This study included 25 patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery fixed with resorbable screws after sagittal split osteotomy at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Five resorbable screws (Inion CPS (R), Inion Ltd., Finland) were applied bicortically at each osteotomy site via a transbuccal approach. No rigid intermaxillary fixation was applied on the first postoperative day. Passive mouth opening exercises were allowed, using two light, rubber elastics for guidance. The control group was 25 patients fixed with four titanium screws. The follow-up period was 12-22 months (mean 17.8 months). Postoperative skeletal changes on lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed and compared between the two groups preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: The average setback was 6.9 mm and no major intraoperative complications occurred. One patient experienced infection immediately after surgery that was controlled uneventfully. The data did not demonstrate any significant difference in postoperative skeletal stability between the two groups. Differences between the immediate postoperative state and 6 months after surgery were not significant. In earlier cases, especially for patients with severe mandibular prognathism, immediate postoperative elastic traction was needed for stable occlusal guidance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that bicortical resorbable screws offer a clinically stable outcome for the fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism. However the resorbable screws showed less stable results vertically than the titanium screws. (C) 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 664
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STABILITY OF THE MANDIBLE AFTER SAGITTAL RAMUS OSTEOTOMY FOR CORRECTION OF PROGNATHISM
    KOBAYASHI, T
    WATANABE, I
    UEDA, K
    NAKAJIMA, T
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 44 (09) : 693 - 697
  • [33] Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy: Is a Bicortical 2-Screw Osteosynthesis Adequate?
    Hugentobler, Max
    Lenoir, Vincent
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (06) : 2094 - 2096
  • [34] Surgical guide and CAD/CAM prebent titanium plate for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in the correction of mandibular prognathism
    Xue, C.
    Tian, Y.
    Wang, L.
    Yang, X.
    Luo, E.
    Bai, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (07): : 586 - 593
  • [35] Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Al-Moraissi, E. A. M.
    Ellis, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [37] Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an alternative for some cases of asymmetric mandibular prognathism
    Farina, R.
    Mebus, C.
    Mayer, C.
    Torrealba, R.
    Moreno, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 47 (05) : 630 - 637
  • [38] Evaluation of Bone Remodeling After Simultaneous Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Mandibular Angle Ostectomy in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism
    Choi, Song Jay
    Sim, You-Song
    Han, Jeong Joon
    Kook, Min-Suk
    Park, Hong-Ju
    Oh, Hee-Kyun
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 78 (11) : 2071.e1 - 2071.e11
  • [39] Lingual nerve injury associated with overpenetration of bicortical screws used for fixation of a bilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Schow, SR
    Triplett, RG
    Solomon, JM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (12) : 1451 - 1452
  • [40] MANDIBULAR ANATOMY AS IT RELATES TO RIGID FIXATION OF THE SAGITTAL RAMUS SPLIT OSTEOTOMY
    SMITH, BR
    RAJCHEL, JL
    WAITE, DE
    READ, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1991, 49 (03) : 222 - 226