Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism

被引:47
|
作者
Paeng, Jun-Young [1 ]
Hong, Jongrak [1 ]
Kim, Chang-Soo [1 ]
Kim, Myung-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Mandibular prognathism; Resorbable screw; Titanium screw; POLY-L-LACTIDE; ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY; MINIPLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS; METALLIC PLATES; SHEEP; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2011.11.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Resorbable screw fixation for orthognathic surgery is widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery and has several advantages. However, surgeons are concerned about using resorbable screws in orthognathic surgery because of possible postoperative complications such as relapse, screw fracture, and infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of bicortical resorbable screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular prognathism. Materials and methods: This study included 25 patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery fixed with resorbable screws after sagittal split osteotomy at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Five resorbable screws (Inion CPS (R), Inion Ltd., Finland) were applied bicortically at each osteotomy site via a transbuccal approach. No rigid intermaxillary fixation was applied on the first postoperative day. Passive mouth opening exercises were allowed, using two light, rubber elastics for guidance. The control group was 25 patients fixed with four titanium screws. The follow-up period was 12-22 months (mean 17.8 months). Postoperative skeletal changes on lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed and compared between the two groups preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: The average setback was 6.9 mm and no major intraoperative complications occurred. One patient experienced infection immediately after surgery that was controlled uneventfully. The data did not demonstrate any significant difference in postoperative skeletal stability between the two groups. Differences between the immediate postoperative state and 6 months after surgery were not significant. In earlier cases, especially for patients with severe mandibular prognathism, immediate postoperative elastic traction was needed for stable occlusal guidance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that bicortical resorbable screws offer a clinically stable outcome for the fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism. However the resorbable screws showed less stable results vertically than the titanium screws. (C) 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 664
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation
    Chung, Il-Hyuk
    Yoo, Chung-Kyu
    Lee, Eun-Kyung
    Ihm, Jong-An
    Park, Chang-Joo
    Lim, Ji-Sun
    Hwang, Kyung-Gyun
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (03) : 446 - 452
  • [2] Skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with physiological positioning in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry
    Ohba, Seigo
    Nakao, Noriko
    Kawasaki, Takako
    Miura, Kei-ichiro
    Minamizato, Tokutaro
    Koga, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshida, Noriaki
    Asahina, Izumi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 54 (08): : 920 - 926
  • [3] Skeletal stability after simultaneous mandibular angle resection and sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandible prognathism
    Kim, Chul-Hwan
    Lee, Ju-Hyun
    Cho, Ju-Yeon
    Lee, Jae-Hoon
    Kim, Kyung-Wook
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (02) : 192 - 197
  • [4] Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Dolanmaz, D
    Uckan, S
    Isik, K
    Saglam, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 42 (02): : 127 - 132
  • [5] Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without extraction of the third molar in patients with mandibular prognathism
    Moroi, Akinori
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Iguchi, Ran
    Hiroumi, Ikawa
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Hotta, Asami
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Saita, Yuriko
    Ueki, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (07) : 1104 - 1108
  • [6] The sagittal split ramus osteotomy as the preferred treatment for mandibular prognathism
    Wolford, LM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (03) : 310 - 312
  • [7] Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep
    Cilasun, Ulkem
    Uckan, Sina
    Dolanmaz, Dogan
    Saglam, Haci
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 44 (06): : 534 - 537
  • [8] Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit
    Ulu, Murat
    Soylu, Emrah
    Kelebek, Seyfi
    Dikici, Serkan
    Oflaz, Hakan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (02) : 299 - 304
  • [9] Biomechanical Comparison of Stability of Resorbable Plate-Screw Fixation Systems in Different Configurations After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Ulu, Murat
    Kelebek, Seyfi
    Dikici, Serkan
    Akcay, Huseyin
    Oflaz, Hakan
    2015 19TH NATIONAL BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING MEETING (BIYOMUT), 2015,
  • [10] Does the Pharyngeal Airway Recover After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Prognathism?
    Jeon, Jae-Yun
    Kim, Tae-Sun
    Kim, Sang Yoon
    Park, Chang-Joo
    Hwang, Kyung-Gyun
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (01) : 162 - 169