The AVOID programme's new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation

被引:16
|
作者
Warren, R. [1 ]
Lowe, J. A. [2 ]
Arnell, N. W. [3 ]
Hope, C. [4 ]
Berry, P. [5 ]
Brown, S. [6 ]
Gambhir, A. [7 ]
Gosling, S. N. [8 ]
Nicholls, R. J. [6 ]
O'Hanley, J. [9 ]
Osborn, T. J. [10 ]
Osborne, T. [3 ]
Price, J. [11 ]
Raper, S. C. B. [12 ]
Rose, G. [3 ]
Vanderwal, J. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Reading, Met Off Hadley Ctr, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[3] Univ Reading, Walker Inst, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge CB2 1AG, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[6] Univ Southampton Highfield, Dept Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Grantham Inst Climate Change, London SW7 2AZ, England
[8] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[9] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
[10] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[11] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndal Ctr 1, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[12] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, CATE, Fac Sci & Engn, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England
[13] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Biodivers & Climate Change, Sch Marine & Trop Biol, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0814-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantitative simulations of the global-scale benefits of climate change mitigation are presented, using a harmonised, self-consistent approach based on a single set of climate change scenarios. The approach draws on a synthesis of output from both physically-based and economics-based models, and incorporates uncertainty analyses. Previous studies have projected global and regional climate change and its impacts over the 21st century but have generally focused on analysis of business-as-usual scenarios, with no explicit mitigation policy included. This study finds that both the economics-based and physically-based models indicate that early, stringent mitigation would avoid a large proportion of the impacts of climate change projected for the 2080s. However, it also shows that not all the impacts can now be avoided, so that adaptation would also therefore be needed to avoid some of the potential damage. Delay in mitigation substantially reduces the percentage of impacts that can be avoided, providing strong new quantitative evidence for the need for stringent and prompt global mitigation action on greenhouse gas emissions, combined with effective adaptation, if large, widespread climate change impacts are to be avoided. Energy technology models suggest that such stringent and prompt mitigation action is technologically feasible, although the estimated costs vary depending on the specific modelling approach and assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health Co-benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Action
    Taseska-Gjorgievska, Verica
    Dedinec, Aleksandar
    Markovska, Natasa
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2024, 12 (03):
  • [32] The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: A conceptual framework
    Krupnick, A
    Burtraw, D
    Markandya, A
    ANCILLARY BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION, 2000, : 53 - 93
  • [33] The secondary benefits of climate change mitigation: An overlapping generations approach
    Bahn O.
    Leach A.
    Computational Management Science, 2008, 5 (3) : 233 - 257
  • [34] Climate change: Hidden health benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation
    Cifuentes, L
    Borja-Aburto, VH
    Gouveia, N
    Thurston, G
    Davis, DL
    SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5533) : 1257 - 1259
  • [35] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Akashi, Osamu
    Wada, Kenichi
    Kanudia, Amit
    Li, Jun
    Weyant, John
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) : 397 - 411
  • [36] TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
    MORGENSTERN, RD
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1991, 81 (02): : 140 - 145
  • [37] Equity, efficiency, uncertainty, and the mitigation of global climate change
    Hammitt, JK
    Harvey, CM
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (06) : 851 - 860
  • [38] The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation
    Duncanson, L.
    Liang, M.
    Leitold, V.
    Armston, J.
    Moorthy, S. M. Krishna
    Dubayah, R.
    Costedoat, S.
    Enquist, B. J.
    Fatoyinbo, L.
    Goetz, S. J.
    Gonzalez-Roglich, M.
    Merow, C.
    Roehrdanz, P. R.
    Tabor, K.
    Zvoleff, A.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [39] The effectiveness of global protected areas for climate change mitigation
    L. Duncanson
    M. Liang
    V. Leitold
    J. Armston
    S. M. Krishna Moorthy
    R. Dubayah
    S. Costedoat
    B. J. Enquist
    L. Fatoyinbo
    S. J. Goetz
    M. Gonzalez-Roglich
    C. Merow
    P. R. Roehrdanz
    K. Tabor
    A. Zvoleff
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [40] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Masahiro Sugiyama
    Osamu Akashi
    Kenichi Wada
    Amit Kanudia
    Jun Li
    John Weyant
    Climatic Change, 2014, 123 : 397 - 411