The AVOID programme's new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation

被引:16
|
作者
Warren, R. [1 ]
Lowe, J. A. [2 ]
Arnell, N. W. [3 ]
Hope, C. [4 ]
Berry, P. [5 ]
Brown, S. [6 ]
Gambhir, A. [7 ]
Gosling, S. N. [8 ]
Nicholls, R. J. [6 ]
O'Hanley, J. [9 ]
Osborn, T. J. [10 ]
Osborne, T. [3 ]
Price, J. [11 ]
Raper, S. C. B. [12 ]
Rose, G. [3 ]
Vanderwal, J. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Reading, Met Off Hadley Ctr, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[3] Univ Reading, Walker Inst, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge CB2 1AG, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[6] Univ Southampton Highfield, Dept Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Grantham Inst Climate Change, London SW7 2AZ, England
[8] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[9] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
[10] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[11] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndal Ctr 1, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[12] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, CATE, Fac Sci & Engn, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England
[13] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Biodivers & Climate Change, Sch Marine & Trop Biol, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0814-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantitative simulations of the global-scale benefits of climate change mitigation are presented, using a harmonised, self-consistent approach based on a single set of climate change scenarios. The approach draws on a synthesis of output from both physically-based and economics-based models, and incorporates uncertainty analyses. Previous studies have projected global and regional climate change and its impacts over the 21st century but have generally focused on analysis of business-as-usual scenarios, with no explicit mitigation policy included. This study finds that both the economics-based and physically-based models indicate that early, stringent mitigation would avoid a large proportion of the impacts of climate change projected for the 2080s. However, it also shows that not all the impacts can now be avoided, so that adaptation would also therefore be needed to avoid some of the potential damage. Delay in mitigation substantially reduces the percentage of impacts that can be avoided, providing strong new quantitative evidence for the need for stringent and prompt global mitigation action on greenhouse gas emissions, combined with effective adaptation, if large, widespread climate change impacts are to be avoided. Energy technology models suggest that such stringent and prompt mitigation action is technologically feasible, although the estimated costs vary depending on the specific modelling approach and assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Energy security and global climate change mitigation
    Huntington, HG
    Brown, SPA
    ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) : 715 - 718
  • [22] Global Climate Change Mitigation: Strategic Incentives
    Perdana, Sigit
    Tyers, Rod
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (03): : 183 - 206
  • [23] Representing global climate change, adaptation and mitigation
    Barker, T
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [24] Soil carbon and the mitigation of global climate change
    Machado, PLOD
    QUIMICA NOVA, 2005, 28 (02): : 329 - 334
  • [25] Classification of mitigation measures to global climate change
    Yanagisawa, Y
    STRATEGIC VALUE OF FOSSIL FUELS: CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 717 - 719
  • [26] Patience and climate change mitigation: Global evidence
    Cai, Meina
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    Murtazashvili, Jennifer Brick
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 186
  • [27] Bringing the Future Into Focus: Benefits and Challenges of High-Resolution Global Climate Change Simulations
    Yeager, Stephen G.
    Danabasoglu, Gokhan
    Edwards, James
    Rosenbloom, Nan
    Castruccio, Fred
    Chang, Ping
    Zhang, Qiuying
    Fu, Dan
    Liu, Xue
    COMPUTING IN SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2021, 23 (03) : 34 - 41
  • [28] Sustainably developing global blue carbon for climate change mitigation and economic benefits through international cooperation
    Feng, Cuicui
    Ye, Guanqiong
    Zeng, Jiangning
    Zeng, Jian
    Jiang, Qutu
    He, Liuyue
    Zhang, Yaowen
    Xu, Zhenci
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [29] Sustainably developing global blue carbon for climate change mitigation and economic benefits through international cooperation
    Cuicui Feng
    Guanqiong Ye
    Jiangning Zeng
    Jian Zeng
    Qutu Jiang
    Liuyue He
    Yaowen Zhang
    Zhenci Xu
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [30] Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs
    Wilcock, Robert
    Elliott, Sandy
    Hudson, Neale
    Parkyn, Stephanie
    Quinn, John
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (11) : 2093 - 2099