The AVOID programme's new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation

被引:16
|
作者
Warren, R. [1 ]
Lowe, J. A. [2 ]
Arnell, N. W. [3 ]
Hope, C. [4 ]
Berry, P. [5 ]
Brown, S. [6 ]
Gambhir, A. [7 ]
Gosling, S. N. [8 ]
Nicholls, R. J. [6 ]
O'Hanley, J. [9 ]
Osborn, T. J. [10 ]
Osborne, T. [3 ]
Price, J. [11 ]
Raper, S. C. B. [12 ]
Rose, G. [3 ]
Vanderwal, J. [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Reading, Met Off Hadley Ctr, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[3] Univ Reading, Walker Inst, Reading RG6 6AR, Berks, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Cambridge CB2 1AG, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Environm, Environm Change Inst, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
[6] Univ Southampton Highfield, Dept Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[7] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Grantham Inst Climate Change, London SW7 2AZ, England
[8] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[9] Univ Kent, Kent Business Sch, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
[10] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[11] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndal Ctr 1, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[12] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, CATE, Fac Sci & Engn, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England
[13] James Cook Univ, Ctr Trop Biodivers & Climate Change, Sch Marine & Trop Biol, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
关键词
POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0814-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Quantitative simulations of the global-scale benefits of climate change mitigation are presented, using a harmonised, self-consistent approach based on a single set of climate change scenarios. The approach draws on a synthesis of output from both physically-based and economics-based models, and incorporates uncertainty analyses. Previous studies have projected global and regional climate change and its impacts over the 21st century but have generally focused on analysis of business-as-usual scenarios, with no explicit mitigation policy included. This study finds that both the economics-based and physically-based models indicate that early, stringent mitigation would avoid a large proportion of the impacts of climate change projected for the 2080s. However, it also shows that not all the impacts can now be avoided, so that adaptation would also therefore be needed to avoid some of the potential damage. Delay in mitigation substantially reduces the percentage of impacts that can be avoided, providing strong new quantitative evidence for the need for stringent and prompt global mitigation action on greenhouse gas emissions, combined with effective adaptation, if large, widespread climate change impacts are to be avoided. Energy technology models suggest that such stringent and prompt mitigation action is technologically feasible, although the estimated costs vary depending on the specific modelling approach and assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 70
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The AVOID programme’s new simulations of the global benefits of stringent climate change mitigation
    R. Warren
    J. A. Lowe
    N. W. Arnell
    C. Hope
    P. Berry
    S. Brown
    A. Gambhir
    S. N. Gosling
    R. J. Nicholls
    J. O’Hanley
    T. J. Osborn
    T. Osborne
    J. Price
    S. C. B. Raper
    G. Rose
    J. Vanderwal
    Climatic Change, 2013, 120 : 55 - 70
  • [2] The fiscal benefits of stringent climate change mitigation: an overview
    Siegmeier, Jan
    Mattauch, Linus
    Franks, Max
    Klenert, David
    Schultes, Anselm
    Edenhofer, Ottmar
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (03) : 352 - 367
  • [3] Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
    Tomoko Hasegawa
    Shinichiro Fujimori
    Petr Havlík
    Hugo Valin
    Benjamin Leon Bodirsky
    Jonathan C. Doelman
    Thomas Fellmann
    Page Kyle
    Jason F. L. Koopman
    Hermann Lotze-Campen
    Daniel Mason-D’Croz
    Yuki Ochi
    Ignacio Pérez Domínguez
    Elke Stehfest
    Timothy B. Sulser
    Andrzej Tabeau
    Kiyoshi Takahashi
    Jun’ya Takakura
    Hans van Meijl
    Willem-Jan van Zeist
    Keith Wiebe
    Peter Witzke
    Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 699 - 703
  • [4] Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Havlik, Petr
    Valin, Hugo
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Doelman, Jonathan C.
    Fellmann, Thomas
    Kyle, Page
    Koopman, Jason F. L.
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Mason-D'Croz, Daniel
    Ochi, Yuki
    Perez Dominguez, Ignacio
    Stehfest, Elke
    Sulser, Timothy B.
    Tabeau, Andrzej
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Takakura, Jun'ya
    van Meijl, Hans
    van Zeist, Willem-Jan
    Wiebe, Keith
    Witzke, Peter
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (08) : 699 - +
  • [5] China's Role in Global Climate Change Mitigation
    Ross Garnaut
    China & World Economy, 2014, (05) : 2 - 18
  • [6] China's Role in Global Climate Change Mitigation
    Garnaut, Ross
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2014, 22 (05) : 2 - 18
  • [7] Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation in Russia
    S. Avaliany
    D. Dudek
    A. Golub
    E. Strukova
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2023, 28 : 1 - 18
  • [8] Benefits of mitigation of climate change for coastal areas
    Nicholls, RJ
    Lowe, JA
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2004, 14 (03): : 229 - 244
  • [9] Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation in Russia
    Avaliany, S.
    Dudek, D.
    Golub, A.
    Strukova, E.
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2023, 28 (SUPPL 1) : 1 - 18
  • [10] Global Climate Change and the Mitigation Challenge
    Princiotta, Frank
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2009, 59 (10): : 1194 - 1211