Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation - A biomechanical analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Lehman, RA
Kuklo, TR
Belmont, PJ
Andersen, RC
Polly, DW
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
biomechanics; bone mineral density; insertional torque; pedicle screw; sacral promontory; sacrum; spinal fixation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws. Objective. To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. Summary of Background Data. Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown. Methods. For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI). Results. Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 +/- 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 +/- 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the "tricorticat" technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 +/- 0.25 mg/cm(2) (range, 507-1428 mg/cm(2)). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806; P 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48; P = 0.16). Conclusions. The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0,005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 811
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase
    Lehmann, W
    Blauth, M
    Briem, D
    Schmidt, U
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2004, 13 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [22] Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase
    Wolfgang Lehmann
    Michael Blauth
    Daniel Briem
    Ulf Schmidt
    European Spine Journal, 2004, 13 : 69 - 75
  • [23] Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Lumbar Screw-plate Fixation versus Posterior Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation
    刘列华
    郭从涛
    周强
    蒲小兵
    宋磊
    王浩明
    赵晨
    成仕明
    兰阳军
    刘岭
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Medical Sciences), 2014, 34 (06) : 907 - 911
  • [24] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation
    Lie-hua Liu
    Cong-tao Guo
    Qiang Zhou
    Xiao-bing Pu
    Lei Song
    Hao-ming Wang
    Chen Zhao
    Shi-ming Cheng
    Yang-jun Lan
    Ling Liu
    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences], 2014, 34 : 907 - 911
  • [25] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar screw-plate fixation versus posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation
    Liu, Lie-hua
    Guo, Cong-tao
    Zhou, Qiang
    Pu, Xiao-bing
    Song, Lei
    Wang, Hao-ming
    Zhao, Chen
    Cheng, Shi-ming
    Lan, Yang-jun
    Liu, Ling
    JOURNAL OF HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 34 (06) : 907 - 911
  • [26] Clinical study on freehand of bicortical sacral screw fixation with the assistance of torque measurement device
    Jiang, Guozheng
    Xu, Luchun
    Ma, Yukun
    Guan, Jianbin
    Feng, Ningning
    Qiu, Ziye
    Zhou, Shibo
    Li, Wenhao
    Yang, Yongdong
    Qu, Yi
    Zhao, He
    Li, Zeyu
    Yu, Xing
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [27] Biomechanical Analysis of Sacral Screw Strain and Range of Motion in Long Posterior Spinal Fixation Constructs Effects of Lumbosacral Fixation Strategies in Reducing Sacral Screw Strains
    Fleischer, Gary D.
    Kim, Yongjung J.
    Ferrara, Lisa A.
    Freeman, Andrew L.
    Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (03) : E163 - E169
  • [28] Biomechanical Analysis of Latarjet Screw Fixation: Comparison of Screw Types and Fixation Methods
    Shin, Jason J.
    Hamamoto, Jason T.
    Leroux, Timothy S.
    Saccomanno, Maristella F.
    Jain, Akshay
    Khair, Mahmoud M.
    Mellano, Christen R.
    Shewman, Elizabeth F.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (09): : 1646 - 1653
  • [29] A Biomechanical Evaluation of Bicortical Metal Screw Fixation Versus Absorbable Interference Screw Fixation After Coracoid Transfer for Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Weppe, Florent
    Magnussen, Robert A.
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Demey, Guillaume
    Neyret, Philippe
    Servien, Elvire
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (10): : 1358 - 1363
  • [30] A Review of the Historical Evolution, Biomechanical Advantage, Clinical Applications, and Safe Insertion Techniques of Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation
    Tukkapuram, Venkata Ramakrishna
    Kuniyoshi, Abumi
    Ito, Manabu
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 3 (02): : 126 - 135