A comparison of the effects of isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia on auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in rats

被引:54
|
作者
Ruebhausen, M. R. [1 ]
Brozoski, T. J. [1 ]
Bauer, C. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] So Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Springfield, IL 62702 USA
关键词
CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW; HALOTHANE; MICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.005
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an acoustically evoked potential commonly used to determine hearing sensitivity in laboratory animals. Both isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine anesthesia are commonly used to immobilize animals during ABR procedures. Hearing threshold determination is often the primary interest. Although a number of studies have examined the effect of different anesthetics on evoked potential waveforms and growth functions, none have directly compared their effect on ABR hearing threshold estimates. The present study used a within-subject comparison and typical threshold criteria, to examine the effect of isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine on ABR thresholds for clicks and pure-tone stimuli extending from 8 to 32 kHz. At comparable physiological doses, hearing thresholds obtained with isoflurane (1.7% in O-2) were on average elevated across a broad frequency range by greater than 27 dB compared to ketamine/xylazine (ketamine HCl, 50 mg/kg: xylazine, 9 mg/kg). This highly significant threshold effect (F-1,F-6 = 158.3403, p = 3.51 x 10(-22)) demonstrates a substantial difference between general anesthetics on auditory brainstem sensitivity. Potential mechanisms and implications for ABR threshold determination under anesthesia are discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ketamine and isoflurane anesthesia effects on mouse electroretinography.
    Grose, JD
    Pillers, DM
    Woodward, WR
    Malmin, B
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S142 - S142
  • [22] Auditory profile of Cav 2.3 mice using auditory brainstem response (ABR) analysis
    Lundt, A.
    Kahl, T.
    Papazoglou, A.
    Broich, K.
    Weiergraeber, M.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2014, 210 : 222 - 222
  • [23] Frequency Analysis System for Auditory Nerves with Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) by Harmonious Tone
    College of Science and Engineering Aoyama Gakuin University, 6-16-1 Chitosedai, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo
    157, Japan
    J. Rob. Mechatronics, 2 (163-166):
  • [24] Combined effects of gentamicin and noise on auditory brainstem response in rats
    Morioka, I
    Luo, WZ
    Ishii, N
    Miyashita, K
    Takeda, S
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1997, 205 (04) : 539 - 544
  • [25] In-air hearing of a diving duck: A comparison of psychoacoustic and auditory brainstem response thresholds
    Crowell, Sara E.
    Wells-Berlin, Alicia M.
    Therrien, Ronald E.
    Yannuzzi, Sally E.
    Carr, Catherine E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 139 (05): : 3001 - 3008
  • [26] Frequency Analysis System of Auditory Nerves with Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) by Harmonious Tone
    Ide, Hideto
    Ohtsuka, Masao
    Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 1993, 5 (04) : 407 - 408
  • [27] The Masked ABR (mABR): a New Measurement Method for the Auditory Brainstem Response
    Brandt, Christian
    Brande-Lavridsen, Nanna
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jakob
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 19 (06): : 753 - 761
  • [28] MICROPROCESSOR-BASED AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE (ABR) SIMULATOR.
    Kaplan, R.
    Ozdamar, O.
    Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 1987, 25 (05): : 560 - 566
  • [29] The contribution of inferior colliculus activity to the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in mice
    Land, Ruediger
    Burghard, Alice
    Kral, Andrej
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 341 : 109 - 118
  • [30] The Masked ABR (mABR): a New Measurement Method for the Auditory Brainstem Response
    Christian Brandt
    Nanna Brande-Lavridsen
    Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2018, 19 : 753 - 761