An evaluation of transferability of ecological niche models

被引:129
|
作者
Qiao, Huijie [1 ]
Feng, Xiao [2 ]
Escobar, Luis E. [3 ]
Peterson, A. Townsend [4 ]
Soberon, Jorge [4 ]
Zhu, Gengping [4 ,5 ]
Papes, Monica [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Inst Zool, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Inst Environm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Fish & Wild Conservat, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Inst, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[5] Tianjin Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
extrapolation; interpolation; non-analog environment; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; PREDICTION; CONSTRAINTS; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; COMPLEXITY; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/ecog.03986
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecological niche modeling (ENM) is used widely to study species' geographic distributions. ENM applications frequently involve transferring models calibrated with environmental data from one region to other regions or times that may include novel environmental conditions. When novel conditions are present, transferability implies extrapolation, whereas, in absence of such conditions, transferability is an interpolation step only. We evaluated transferability of models produced using 11 ENM algorithms from the perspective of interpolation and extrapolation in a virtual species framework. We defined fundamental niches and potential distributions of 16 virtual species distributed across Eurasia. To simulate real situations of incomplete understanding of species' distribution or existing fundamental niche (environmental conditions suitable for the species contained in the study area; N*(F)), we divided Eurasia into six regions and used 1-5 regions for model calibration and the rest for model evaluation. The models produced with the 11 ENM algorithms were evaluated in environmental space, to complement the traditional geographic evaluation of models. None of the algorithms accurately estimated the existing fundamental niche (N*(F)) given one region in calibration, and model evaluation scores decreased as the novelty of the environments in the evaluation regions increased. Thus, we recommend quantifying environmental similarity between calibration and transfer regions prior to model transfer, providing an avenue for assessing uncertainty of model transferability. Different algorithms had different sensitivity to completeness of knowledge of N*(F), with implications for algorithm selection. If the goal is to reconstruct fundamental niches, users should choose algorithms with limited extrapolation when N*(F) is well known, or choose algorithms with increased extrapolation when N*(F) is poorly known. Our assessment can inform applications of ecological niche modeling transference to anticipate species invasions into novel areas, disease emergence in new regions, and forecasts of species distributions under future climate conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 534
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving ecological niche models by data mining large environmental datasets for surrogate models
    Stockwell, DRB
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 192 (1-2) : 188 - 196
  • [32] Niche Divergence in a Brown Lemur (Eulemur spp.) Hybrid Zone: Using Ecological Niche Models to Test Models of Stability
    Johnson, Steig E.
    Delmore, Kira E.
    Brown, Kerry A.
    Wyman, Tracy M.
    Louis, Edward E., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2016, 37 (01) : 69 - 88
  • [33] Niche Divergence in a Brown Lemur (Eulemur spp.) Hybrid Zone: Using Ecological Niche Models to Test Models of Stability
    Steig E. Johnson
    Kira E. Delmore
    Kerry A. Brown
    Tracy M. Wyman
    Edward E. Louis
    International Journal of Primatology, 2016, 37 : 69 - 88
  • [34] Evaluation of the ecological niche model approach in spatial conservation prioritization
    Ishihama, Fumiko
    Takenaka, Akio
    Yokomizo, Hiroyuki
    Kadoya, Taku
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [35] Are we overestimating the niche? Removing marginal localities helps ecological niche models detect environmental barriers
    Soley-Guardia, Mariano
    Gutierrez, Eliecer E.
    Thomas, Darla M.
    Ochoa-G, Jose
    Aguilera, Marisol
    Anderson, Robert P.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 6 (05): : 1267 - 1279
  • [36] Prediction of wild pistachio ecological niche using machine learning models
    Damaneh, Javad Momeni
    Ahmadi, Jalil
    Rahmanian, Soroor
    Sadeghi, Seyed Mohammad Moein
    Nasiri, Vahid
    Borz, Stelian Alexandru
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 72
  • [37] Environmental filtering improves ecological niche models across multiple scales
    Castellanos, Adrian A.
    Huntley, Jerry W.
    Voelker, Gary
    Lawing, A. Michelle
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 10 (04): : 481 - 492
  • [38] Trends and biases in global scientific literature about ecological niche models
    Vaz, U. L.
    Cunha, H. F.
    Nabout, J. C.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2015, 75 (04) : S17 - S24
  • [39] Ecological Niche Models of Four Hard Tick Genera (Ixodidae) in Mexico
    Clarke-Crespo, Emilio
    Moreno-Arzate, Claudia N.
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Carlos A.
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [40] Niche-Based vs. Neutral Models of Ecological Communities
    Gregory M. Mikkelson
    Biology and Philosophy, 2005, 20 (2-3): : 557 - 566