An evaluation of transferability of ecological niche models

被引:129
|
作者
Qiao, Huijie [1 ]
Feng, Xiao [2 ]
Escobar, Luis E. [3 ]
Peterson, A. Townsend [4 ]
Soberon, Jorge [4 ]
Zhu, Gengping [4 ,5 ]
Papes, Monica [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Anim Ecol & Conservat Biol, Inst Zool, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Inst Environm, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Fish & Wild Conservat, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Biodivers Inst, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[5] Tianjin Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
extrapolation; interpolation; non-analog environment; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; DISTRIBUTIONS; PREDICTION; CONSTRAINTS; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; COMPLEXITY; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/ecog.03986
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecological niche modeling (ENM) is used widely to study species' geographic distributions. ENM applications frequently involve transferring models calibrated with environmental data from one region to other regions or times that may include novel environmental conditions. When novel conditions are present, transferability implies extrapolation, whereas, in absence of such conditions, transferability is an interpolation step only. We evaluated transferability of models produced using 11 ENM algorithms from the perspective of interpolation and extrapolation in a virtual species framework. We defined fundamental niches and potential distributions of 16 virtual species distributed across Eurasia. To simulate real situations of incomplete understanding of species' distribution or existing fundamental niche (environmental conditions suitable for the species contained in the study area; N*(F)), we divided Eurasia into six regions and used 1-5 regions for model calibration and the rest for model evaluation. The models produced with the 11 ENM algorithms were evaluated in environmental space, to complement the traditional geographic evaluation of models. None of the algorithms accurately estimated the existing fundamental niche (N*(F)) given one region in calibration, and model evaluation scores decreased as the novelty of the environments in the evaluation regions increased. Thus, we recommend quantifying environmental similarity between calibration and transfer regions prior to model transfer, providing an avenue for assessing uncertainty of model transferability. Different algorithms had different sensitivity to completeness of knowledge of N*(F), with implications for algorithm selection. If the goal is to reconstruct fundamental niches, users should choose algorithms with limited extrapolation when N*(F) is well known, or choose algorithms with increased extrapolation when N*(F) is poorly known. Our assessment can inform applications of ecological niche modeling transference to anticipate species invasions into novel areas, disease emergence in new regions, and forecasts of species distributions under future climate conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 534
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model application niche analysis: assessing the transferability and generalizability of ecological models
    Moon, Jessica B.
    Dewitt, Theodore H.
    Errend, Melissa N.
    Bruins, Randall J. F.
    Kentula, Mary E.
    Chamberlain, Sarah J.
    Fennessy, M. Siobhan
    Naithani, Kusum J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2017, 8 (10):
  • [2] Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Papes, Monica
    Eaton, Muir
    ECOGRAPHY, 2007, 30 (04) : 550 - 560
  • [3] Effects of species traits and environmental predictors on performance and transferability of ecological niche models
    Regos, Adrian
    Gagne, Laura
    Alcaraz-Segura, Domingo
    Honrado, Joao P.
    Dominguez, Jesus
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [4] Effects of species traits and environmental predictors on performance and transferability of ecological niche models
    Adrián Regos
    Laura Gagne
    Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
    João P. Honrado
    Jesús Domínguez
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [5] Outstanding Challenges in the Transferability of Ecological Models
    Yates, Katherine L.
    Bouchet, Phil J.
    Caley, M. Julian
    Mengersen, Kerrie
    Randin, Christophe F.
    Parnell, Stephen
    Fielding, Alan H.
    Bamford, Andrew J.
    Ban, Stephen
    Marcia Barbosa, A.
    Dormann, Carsten F.
    Elith, Jane
    Embling, Clare B.
    Ervin, Gary N.
    Fisher, Rebecca
    Gould, Susan
    Graf, Roland F.
    Gregr, Edward J.
    Halpin, Patrick N.
    Heikkinen, Risto K.
    Heinanen, Stefan
    Jones, Alice R.
    Krishnakumar, Periyadan K.
    Lauria, Valentina
    Lozano-Montes, Hector
    Mannocci, Laura
    Mellin, Camille
    Mesgaran, Mohsen B.
    Moreno-Amat, Elena
    Mormede, Sophie
    Novaczek, Emilie
    Oppel, Steffen
    Crespo, Guillermo Ortuno
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Rapacciuolo, Giovanni
    Roberts, Jason J.
    Ross, Rebecca E.
    Scales, Kylie L.
    Schoeman, David
    Snelgrove, Paul
    Sundblad, Goran
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Torres, Leigh G.
    Verbruggen, Heroen
    Wang, Lifei
    Wenger, Seth
    Whittingham, Mark J.
    Zharikov, Yuri
    Zurell, Damaris
    Sequeira, Ana M. M.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2018, 33 (10) : 790 - 802
  • [6] Ecological Niche Transferability Using Invasive Species as a Case Study
    Fernandez, Miguel
    Hamilton, Healy
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [7] Labeling Ecological Niche Models
    Rangel, Thiago Fernando
    Loyola, Rafael Dias
    NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2012, 10 (02): : 119 - 126
  • [8] Transferability of Mechanistic Ecological Models Is About Emergence
    Radchuk, Viktoriia
    Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie
    Grimm, Volker
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2019, 34 (06) : 487 - 488
  • [9] ECOLOGICAL NICHE MODELS OF INVASIVE SEAWEEDS
    Marcelino, Vanessa R.
    Verbruggen, Heroen
    JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY, 2015, 51 (04) : 606 - 620
  • [10] Common mistakes in ecological niche models
    Sillero, Neftali
    Barbosa, A. Marcia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2021, 35 (02) : 213 - 226