Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids

被引:118
|
作者
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [3 ]
Bennett, Carol [2 ]
Murray, Mary Ann [2 ]
Mullan, Sarah [2 ]
Legare, France [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
health literacy; decision aids; prostate cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer prevention; breast cancer/mammography; oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT PATIENTS; CARE; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Decision coaching is individualized, nondirective facilitation of patient preparation for shared decision making. Purpose. To explore characteristics and effectiveness of decision coaching evaluated within trials of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for health decisions. Data Sources. A subanalysis of trials included in the 2011 Cochrane Review of PtDAs. Study Selection. Eligible trials allowed the effectiveness of decision coaching to be compared with another intervention and/or usual care. Data Extraction. Two reviewers independently screened 86 trials, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data Synthesis. Ten trials were eligible. Decision coaching was provided by genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, psychologists, or health educators. Coaching compared with usual care (n = 1 trial) improved knowledge. Coaching plus PtDA compared with usual care (n = 4) improved knowledge and participation in decision making without reported dissatisfaction. Coaching compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) increased values-choice agreement and improved satisfaction with the decision-making process without any difference in knowledge or participation in decision making. Coaching plus PtDA compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) had no difference in knowledge, values-choice agreement, participation in decision making, or satisfaction with the process. Decision coaching plus PtDA was more cost-effective compared with PtDA alone or usual care (n = 1). Limitations. Methodological quality, number of trials, and description of decision coaching. Conclusions. Compared with usual care, decision coaching improved knowledge. However, the improvement in knowledge was similar when coaching was compared with PtDA alone. Outcomes for other comparisons are more variable, some trials showing positive effects and other trials reporting no difference. Given the small number of trials and variability in results, further research is required to determine the effectiveness of decision coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E33
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Erratum to: A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology
    Kristina DemasWoodhouse
    Katie Tremont
    Anil Vachani
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Neha Vapiwala
    Charles B. Simone
    Abigail T. Berman
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 246 - 246
  • [42] Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients
    Wang, Yifan
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Logan, Shanna
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [43] THE IMPORTANCE OF PATIENT DECISION AIDS FOR DECISIONS ABOUT CANCER TREATMENT: A QUALITATIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Huang, Li-Ting
    Doorenbos, Ardith
    Mathew, Asha
    Jang, Min Kyeong
    Mayahara, Masako
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2022, 49 (02) : 55 - 55
  • [44] Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids Is It Time?
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (03): : 247 - 248
  • [45] Effective Decision-Making for Extreme Situations in Sports Coaching
    Maksymchuk, Borys
    Pohrebniak, Dmytro
    Roshchin, Ihor
    Drachuk, Andriy
    Romanenko, Viktor
    Ovcharuk, Vasyl
    Ovcharuk, Vira
    Maksymchuk, Iryna
    REVISTA ROMANEASCA PENTRU EDUCATIE MULTIDIMENSIONALA, 2022, 14 (03): : 510 - 521
  • [46] Naturalistic Decision Making in High Performance Team Sport Coaching
    Harvey, Stephen
    Lyle, John William Baird
    Muir, Bob
    INTERNATIONAL SPORT COACHING JOURNAL, 2015, 2 (02) : 152 - 168
  • [47] COACHING EXPERIENCE: EXAMINING ITS ROLE IN COACHES' DECISION MAKING
    Vergeer, Ineke
    Lyle, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 7 (04) : 431 - 449
  • [48] A Framework for Decision-Making Within Strength and Conditioning Coaching
    Till, Kevin
    Muir, Bob
    Abraham, Andrew
    Piggott, Dave
    Tee, Jason
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2019, 41 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [49] Current situation of shared decision making in osteoporosis: A comprehensive literature review of patient decision aids and decision drivers
    Nogues, Xavier
    Carbonell, Maria Cristina
    Canals, Laura
    Lizan, Luis
    Palacios, Santiago
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2022, 5 (06)
  • [50] Clinicians' and patients' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence decision aids to inform shared decision making: a systematic review
    Hassan, Nehal
    Slight, Robert D.
    Bimpong, Kweku
    Weiand, Daniel
    Vellinga, Akke
    Morgan, Graham
    Slight, Sarah P.
    LANCET, 2021, 398 : 80 - 80