Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids

被引:118
|
作者
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
Kryworuchko, Jennifer [3 ]
Bennett, Carol [2 ]
Murray, Mary Ann [2 ]
Mullan, Sarah [2 ]
Legare, France [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[4] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
health literacy; decision aids; prostate cancer; colorectal cancer; cancer prevention; breast cancer/mammography; oncology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; SUPPORT PATIENTS; CARE; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443311
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Decision coaching is individualized, nondirective facilitation of patient preparation for shared decision making. Purpose. To explore characteristics and effectiveness of decision coaching evaluated within trials of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for health decisions. Data Sources. A subanalysis of trials included in the 2011 Cochrane Review of PtDAs. Study Selection. Eligible trials allowed the effectiveness of decision coaching to be compared with another intervention and/or usual care. Data Extraction. Two reviewers independently screened 86 trials, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data Synthesis. Ten trials were eligible. Decision coaching was provided by genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, psychologists, or health educators. Coaching compared with usual care (n = 1 trial) improved knowledge. Coaching plus PtDA compared with usual care (n = 4) improved knowledge and participation in decision making without reported dissatisfaction. Coaching compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) increased values-choice agreement and improved satisfaction with the decision-making process without any difference in knowledge or participation in decision making. Coaching plus PtDA compared with PtDA alone (n = 4) had no difference in knowledge, values-choice agreement, participation in decision making, or satisfaction with the process. Decision coaching plus PtDA was more cost-effective compared with PtDA alone or usual care (n = 1). Limitations. Methodological quality, number of trials, and description of decision coaching. Conclusions. Compared with usual care, decision coaching improved knowledge. However, the improvement in knowledge was similar when coaching was compared with PtDA alone. Outcomes for other comparisons are more variable, some trials showing positive effects and other trials reporting no difference. Given the small number of trials and variability in results, further research is required to determine the effectiveness of decision coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:E22 / E33
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
    Jeff Belkora
    Shelley Volz
    Meredith Loth
    Alexandra Teng
    Margot Zarin-Pass
    Dan Moore
    Laura Esserman
    BMC Health Services Research, 15
  • [32] Patient Decision Aids to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02): : 479 - 479
  • [33] Coaching patients in the use of decision and communication aids: RE-AIM evaluation of a patient support program
    Belkora, Jeff
    Volz, Shelley
    Loth, Meredith
    Teng, Alexandra
    Zarin-Pass, Margot
    Moore, Dan
    Esserman, Laura
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [34] Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: a systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    Jammal, Walid
    Chiarelli, Pauline
    Gardiner, Robert A.
    Hughes, Suzanne
    Stefanovic, Dana
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1303 - 1315
  • [35] Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review
    Thomas H. Wieringa
    Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
    Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
    Maartje de Wit
    Oscar J. Ponce
    Manuel F. Sanchez-Herrera
    Nataly R. Espinoza
    Yaara Zisman-Ilani
    Marleen Kunneman
    Linda J. Schoonmade
    Victor M. Montori
    Frank J. Snoek
    Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [36] Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review
    Vlemmix, F.
    Warendorf, J. K.
    Rosman, A. N.
    Kok, M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Morris, J. M.
    Nassar, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [37] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [38] Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review
    Wieringa, Thomas H.
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
    de Wit, Maartje
    Ponce, Oscar J.
    Sanchez-Herrera, Manuel F.
    Espinoza, Nataly R.
    Zisman-Ilani, Yaara
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Snoek, Frank J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [39] Decision Aids for Decision Making about Locally Advance Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Maes-Carballo, Marta
    Martin-Diaz, Manuel
    Garcia-Garcia, Manuel
    Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla
    Mignini, Luciano
    Teixeira-Arcaya, Rebeca Patricia
    Khan, Khalid Saeed
    Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2023, 41 (03) : 292 - 304
  • [40] A systematic review of decision support needs of parents making child health decisions
    Jackson, Cath
    Cheater, Francine M.
    Reid, Innes
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (03) : 232 - 251