Differences in perceptions of communication quality between a Twitterbot and human agent for information seeking and learning

被引:31
作者
Edwards, Chad [1 ]
Beattie, Austin J. [1 ]
Edwards, Autumn [1 ]
Spence, Patric R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Sch Commun, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Commun, Div Instruct Commun, Lexington, KY USA
关键词
Twitterbots; CASA; Learning; Twitter; Cognitive elaboration; Bot; TEACHER IMMEDIACY BEHAVIORS; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATE MOTIVATION; COMPUTERS; RESPONSES; NEWS; CREDIBILITY; MODEL; THINK; IF;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Twitter's design allows the implementation of automated programs that can submit tweets, interact with others, and generate content based on algorithms. Scholars and end-users alike refer to these programs to as "Twitterbots." This two-part study explores the differences in perceptions of communication quality between a human agent and a Twitterbot in the areas of cognitive elaboration, information seeking, and learning outcomes. In accordance with the Computers Are Social Actors (CASA) framework (Reeves & Nass, 1996), results suggest that participants learned the same from either a Twitterbot or a human agent. Results are discussed in light of CASA, as well as implications and directions for future studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 671
页数:6
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]   Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it [J].
Lee, KM ;
Park, N ;
Song, H .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2005, 31 (04) :538-563
[32]   A communication researchers' guide to null hypothesis significance testing and alternatives [J].
Levine, Timothy R. ;
Weber, Rene ;
Park, Hee Sun ;
Hullett, Craig R. .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2008, 34 (02) :188-U10
[33]   Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues [J].
Lin, Xialing ;
Spence, Patric R. ;
Lachlan, Kenneth A. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 63 :264-271
[34]  
McCroskey J.C., 1994, 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication
[35]  
McIntyre JJ, 2012, J Emerg Manage, V10, P41, DOI [10.5055/jem.2012.0085, DOI 10.5055/JEM.2012.0085]
[36]  
Morris M. R., 2010, ICWSM, P23
[37]  
Morris M.R., 2012, P ACM 2012 C COMPUTE, P441, DOI DOI 10.1145/2145204.2145274
[38]   Students' state motivation and instructors' use of verbally aggressive messages' [J].
Myers, SA ;
Rocca, KA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2000, 87 (01) :291-294
[39]  
Nadler M. K., 2001, WOM STUD COMMUN, V24, P241, DOI DOI 10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436
[40]   Can computers be teammates? [J].
Nass, C ;
Fogg, BJ ;
Moon, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 1996, 45 (06) :669-678