Accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS

被引:27
|
作者
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Qin, Jie [1 ]
Guo, Ruomi [1 ]
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Jiang, Hang [1 ]
Wang, Xiaohong [1 ]
Kang, Zhuang [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
Shan, Hong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Mol Imaging, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Ctr Intervent Med, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Intervent Radiol, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver; hepatocellular carcinoma; chronic liver disease; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; NODULES; 20; MM; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; DATA SYSTEM; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HEPATIC NODULES; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117716700
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: There are few studies about the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), which was developed with the purpose of standardizing the interpretation and reporting of liver imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HCC diagnosis using LI-RADS. Material and Methods: The computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical data of 297 lesions in 249 patients between June 2012 and August 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Using LI-RADS 2014, two radiologists evaluated the lesions and a LI-RADS category was retrospectively assigned to each nodule. Results: The final diagnoses of 297 nodules in 249 patients consisted of 191 malignant and 106 benign lesions. Out of 44 LI-RADS category 1 lesions, none were HCCs. However, 2/25 category 2 lesions, 3/35 category 3 lesions, 16/25 category 4 lesions, 151/156 category 5 lesions, and 3/12 category LRM/OM (probable malignancy, not specific for HCC/other malignancy) lesions were HCCs. The Kappa value was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.39-0.49) between two observers during LI-RADS grading. Conclusion: The negative predictive value of LI-RADS category 1 was 100%. In addition, a relevant proportion of lesions categorized as category 2 or 3, or even as other malignancies, were HCCs. LI-RADS category 5 had a high specificity for HCC. LI-RADS was not able to give a differential diagnosis for the false-positive lesions of LI-RADS category 5.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Ania Kielar
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Sara Lewis
    Vahid Yaghmai
    Frank H. Miller
    Hooman Yarmohammadi
    Charles Kim
    Victoria Chernyak
    Takeshi Yokoo
    Jeffrey Meyer
    Isabel Newton
    Richard K. Do
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 218 - 230
  • [42] Evaluation of the LI-RADS treatment response algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma after trans-arterial chemoembolization
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Najjar, Marc
    Dutruel, Silvina P.
    Gavlin, Alexander
    Chen, Christine
    Lee, Michael J.
    Askin, Gulce
    Halazun, Karim J.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 (80) : 117 - 122
  • [43] CEUS LI-RADS are effective in predicting the risk hepatocellular carcinoma of liver nodules
    Terzi, E.
    De Bonis, L.
    Leoni, S.
    Benevento, F.
    Granito, A.
    Tovoli, F.
    Pini, P.
    Bolondi, L.
    Piscaglia, F.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (01) : E22 - E22
  • [44] US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment
    Hui Huang
    Mei-Qing Cheng
    Dan-Ni He
    Meng-Fei Xian
    Dan Zeng
    Shao-Hong Wu
    Chao-Qun Li
    Si-Min Ruan
    Ming-De Li
    Man-Xia Lin
    Ming-De Lu
    Ming Kuang
    Wei Wang
    Li-Da Chen
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 9357 - 9367
  • [45] Up-to-Date Role of CT/MRI LI-RADS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2021, 8 : 513 - 527
  • [46] CEUS LI-RADS are effective in predicting the risk hepatocellular carcinoma of liver nodules
    Terzi, E.
    De Bonis, L.
    Leoni, S.
    Benevento, F.
    Granito, A.
    Tovoli, F.
    Pini, P.
    Bolondi, L.
    Piscaglia, F.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 (01) : S208 - S209
  • [47] RISK OF PROGRESSION TO HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN PATIENTS WITH INDETERMINATE (LI-RADS 3) OBSERVATIONS
    Arvind, Ashwini
    Zaki, Timothy A.
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Fetzer, David T.
    Browning, Travis
    Rich, Nicole E.
    Marrero, Jorge A.
    Zhu, Hao
    Yopp, Adam
    Hoshida, Yujin
    Gopal, Purva
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Singal, Amit G.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (06) : S759 - S760
  • [48] LI-RADS Version 2018 Is of Limited Use in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Children
    Paltiel, Harriet J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) : 200 - 201
  • [49] Standardizing diffusion-weighted imaging in LI-RADS for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Scialpi, Michele
    Evangelisti, Arianna
    Shehu, Klesta
    Comite, Paola
    Antogiovanni, Giuseppe Nazareno
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (02) : 695 - 697
  • [50] Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm
    Kielar, Ania
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lewis, Sara
    Yaghmai, Vahid
    Miller, Frank H.
    Yarmohammadi, Hooman
    Kim, Charles
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Newton, Isabel
    Do, Richard K.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 218 - 230