Accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS

被引:27
|
作者
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Qin, Jie [1 ]
Guo, Ruomi [1 ]
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Jiang, Hang [1 ]
Wang, Xiaohong [1 ]
Kang, Zhuang [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
Shan, Hong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Mol Imaging, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Ctr Intervent Med, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Intervent Radiol, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver; hepatocellular carcinoma; chronic liver disease; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; NODULES; 20; MM; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; DATA SYSTEM; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HEPATIC NODULES; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117716700
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: There are few studies about the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), which was developed with the purpose of standardizing the interpretation and reporting of liver imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HCC diagnosis using LI-RADS. Material and Methods: The computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical data of 297 lesions in 249 patients between June 2012 and August 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Using LI-RADS 2014, two radiologists evaluated the lesions and a LI-RADS category was retrospectively assigned to each nodule. Results: The final diagnoses of 297 nodules in 249 patients consisted of 191 malignant and 106 benign lesions. Out of 44 LI-RADS category 1 lesions, none were HCCs. However, 2/25 category 2 lesions, 3/35 category 3 lesions, 16/25 category 4 lesions, 151/156 category 5 lesions, and 3/12 category LRM/OM (probable malignancy, not specific for HCC/other malignancy) lesions were HCCs. The Kappa value was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.39-0.49) between two observers during LI-RADS grading. Conclusion: The negative predictive value of LI-RADS category 1 was 100%. In addition, a relevant proportion of lesions categorized as category 2 or 3, or even as other malignancies, were HCCs. LI-RADS category 5 had a high specificity for HCC. LI-RADS was not able to give a differential diagnosis for the false-positive lesions of LI-RADS category 5.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Indeterminate (LI-RADS 3) Liver Observations
    Arvind, Ashwini
    Joshi, Sagar
    Zaki, Timothy
    Burkholder, Daniel
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Singal, Amit G.
    North Amer Liver Canc NALC Consortium
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (04) : 1091 - +
  • [33] Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI
    Patel, Richa
    Aslam, Anum
    Parikh, Neehar D.
    Mervak, Benjamin
    Mubarak, Eman
    Higgins, Lily
    Lala, Kayli
    Conner, Jack F.
    Khaykin, Valerie
    Bashir, Mustafa
    Do, Richard Kinh Gian
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    Smith, Elainea N.
    Kim, Charles Y.
    Shampain, Kimberly L.
    Owen, Dawn
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (06) : 1641 - 1654
  • [34] LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features
    Ayman Alhasan
    Milena Cerny
    Damien Olivié
    Jean-Sébastien Billiard
    Catherine Bergeron
    Kip Brown
    Paule Bodson-Clermont
    Hélène Castel
    Simon Turcotte
    Pierre Perreault
    An Tang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 517 - 528
  • [35] Impact of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Etiology on the Performance of LI-RADS LR5
    Cheung, Chun Lam
    Tripathi, Vrijesh
    Chiang, Chi-Leung
    Chiu, Keith Wan Hang
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 312 (02)
  • [36] US LI-RADS in surveillance for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment
    Huang, Hui
    Cheng, Mei-Qing
    He, Dan-Ni
    Xian, Meng-Fei
    Zeng, Dan
    Wu, Shao-Hong
    Li, Chao-Qun
    Ruan, Si-Min
    Li, Ming-De
    Lin, Man-Xia
    Lu, Ming-De
    Kuang, Ming
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Li-Da
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (12) : 9357 - 9367
  • [37] Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the 2017 and 2018 versions of LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI
    Ko, A.
    Park, H. J.
    Lee, E. S.
    Park, S. B.
    Kim, Y. K.
    Choi, S-Y
    Ahn, S.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (04) : 319.e1 - 319.e9
  • [38] LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features
    Alhasan, Ayman
    Cerny, Milena
    Olivie, Damien
    Billiard, Jean-Sebastien
    Bergeron, Catherine
    Brown, Kip
    Bodson-Clermont, Paule
    Castel, Helene
    Turcotte, Simon
    Perreault, Pierre
    Tang, An
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (02) : 517 - 528
  • [39] LI-RADS in Patients with Solitary Resected Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Glancing beyond Diagnosis
    Kartalis, Nikolaos
    Grigoriadis, Aristeidis
    RADIOLOGY, 2024, 310 (02)
  • [40] Multivariate Modeling to Establish Association of LI-RADS Major Criteria with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Deen, Surrin S.
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2022, 4 (02): : e229002