Accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS

被引:27
|
作者
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Qin, Jie [1 ]
Guo, Ruomi [1 ]
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Jiang, Hang [1 ]
Wang, Xiaohong [1 ]
Kang, Zhuang [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
Shan, Hong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Mol Imaging, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Ctr Intervent Med, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Intervent Radiol, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver; hepatocellular carcinoma; chronic liver disease; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; NODULES; 20; MM; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; DATA SYSTEM; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; HEPATIC NODULES; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117716700
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: There are few studies about the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), which was developed with the purpose of standardizing the interpretation and reporting of liver imaging examinations in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HCC diagnosis using LI-RADS. Material and Methods: The computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical data of 297 lesions in 249 patients between June 2012 and August 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Using LI-RADS 2014, two radiologists evaluated the lesions and a LI-RADS category was retrospectively assigned to each nodule. Results: The final diagnoses of 297 nodules in 249 patients consisted of 191 malignant and 106 benign lesions. Out of 44 LI-RADS category 1 lesions, none were HCCs. However, 2/25 category 2 lesions, 3/35 category 3 lesions, 16/25 category 4 lesions, 151/156 category 5 lesions, and 3/12 category LRM/OM (probable malignancy, not specific for HCC/other malignancy) lesions were HCCs. The Kappa value was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.39-0.49) between two observers during LI-RADS grading. Conclusion: The negative predictive value of LI-RADS category 1 was 100%. In addition, a relevant proportion of lesions categorized as category 2 or 3, or even as other malignancies, were HCCs. LI-RADS category 5 had a high specificity for HCC. LI-RADS was not able to give a differential diagnosis for the false-positive lesions of LI-RADS category 5.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS
    Barabino, M.
    Mariani, N.
    Fochesato, C.
    Franceschelli, G.
    Angileri, A.
    Santambrogio, R.
    Carrafiello, G. P.
    Opocher, E.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 : E41 - E41
  • [2] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018 for Evaluation of Pediatric Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Khanna, Geetika
    Chavhan, Govind B.
    Schooler, Gary R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    Alazraki, Adina L.
    Squires, Judy H.
    Salter, Amber
    Podberesky, Daniel J.
    Towbin, Alexander J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (01) : 190 - 199
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of US LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance
    Ahmed Haitham Abduljabbar
    Mohammad A. Wazzan
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 54
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of US LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance
    Abduljabbar, Ahmed Haitham
    Wazzan, Mohammad A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 54 (01):
  • [5] LI-RADS and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Tang, An
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Chapman, William C.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (01) : 193 - 202
  • [6] LI-RADS and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    An Tang
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Victoria Chernyak
    William C. Chapman
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 193 - 202
  • [7] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Song, Christopher
    Gavlin, Alexander
    Roudenko, Alexandra
    Lu, Lina
    Askin, Gulce
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1085 - 1092
  • [8] Imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: LI-RADS
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [9] Value of threshold growth as a major diagnostic feature of hepatocellular carcinoma in LI-RADS
    Choi, Se Jin
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 78 (03) : 596 - 603
  • [10] Comparison of modified CEUS LI-RADS with sonazoid and CT/MRI LI-RADS for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sugimoto, Katsutoshi
    Saito, Kazuhiro
    Shirota, Natsuhiko
    Kamiyama, Naohisa
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Wada, Takuya
    Kakegawa, Tatsuya
    Tomita, Yusuke
    Abe, Masakazu
    Yoshimasu, Yu
    Takeuchi, Hirohito
    Itoi, Takao
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2022, 52 (08) : 730 - 738