Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity

被引:23
|
作者
Aday, Jacob S. [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Joshua M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Michigan Univ, Marquette, MI 49855 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Psychol, 101 Sloan Hall, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
Attention bias; Dot-probe task; Test-retest reliability; Target location; Anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; TIME-COURSE; FEARFUL; THREAT; BIAS; ANXIETY; DISENGAGEMENT; CAPTURE; HOLD;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-018-0886-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The dot-probe task is used to measure attentional biases toward threat. However, the test-retest reliability and validity of the task have been called into question. No studies to date have included an extended number of testing sessions or tailored the task to individual participants by incorporating self-relevant stimulidoing so may improve reliability. Here, participants provided 10 words that caused them anxiety and 10 neutral words which were incorporated into a dot-probe task for 6 sessions. The test-retest reliability of their bias indices was stronger in bottom-target trials relative to top-target trials and stronger among later relative to earlier sessions. State and trait anxiety were moderately correlated with bias indices in later sessions, but not earlier sessions. Overall reaction time in each session was moderately correlated with state and trait anxiety. These results suggest that including extended testing may facilitate dot-probe task test-retest reliability and validity.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and test-retest reliability of a disability questionnaire for essential tremor
    Louis, ED
    Barnes, LF
    Wendt, KJ
    Albert, SM
    Pullman, SL
    Yu, QP
    Schneier, FR
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2000, 15 (03) : 516 - 523
  • [32] Test-retest reliability and validity of a frustration paradigm and irritability measures
    Tseng, Wan-Ling
    Moroney, Elizabeth
    Machlin, Laura
    Roberson-Nay, Roxann
    Hettema, John M.
    Carney, Dever
    Stoddard, Joel
    Towbin, Kenneth A.
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Leibenluft, Ellen
    Brotman, Melissa A.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 212 : 38 - 45
  • [33] Test-retest reliability and validity of body composition methods in adults
    Totosy de Zepetnek, Julia O.
    Lee, Jennifer J.
    Boateng, Terence
    Plastina, Stephanie E.
    Cleary, Shane
    Huang, Liuye
    Kucab, Michaela
    Paterakis, Stella
    Brett, Neil R.
    Bellissimo, Nick
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2021, 41 (05) : 417 - 425
  • [34] Test-retest reliability in fMRI of language: Group and task effects
    Chen, E. Elinor
    Small, Steven L.
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2007, 102 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [35] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINE RESPONSES TO AN ASPIRATION LEVEL TASK
    HYYPPA, MT
    KUUSELA, V
    DEVELOPMENTS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 1983, 16 : 75 - 84
  • [36] Test-retest reliability of the simon task: a short version proposal
    Cevada, Thais
    Conde, Erick
    Marques, Deborah
    Deslandes, Andrea Camaz
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (04): : 275 - 282
  • [37] Internal and test-retest reliability of the modified Stroop and the disengagement task
    Ataya, A.
    Adams, S.
    Attwood, A. S.
    Munafo, M. R.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 23 : S553 - S553
  • [38] A FURTHER LOOK AT THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE ALCOHOL PURCHASE TASK
    Acuff, S. F.
    Dennhardt, A. A.
    Soltis, K. E.
    Murphy, J. G.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 40 : 232A - 232A
  • [39] VALIDITY CONVERGENT AND RELIABILITY TEST-RETEST OF THE REY AUDITORY VERBAL LEARNING TEST
    Magalhaes, Sabrina de Sousa
    Malloy-Diniz, Leandro Fernandes
    Hamdan, Amer Cavalheiro
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2012, 9 (03): : 129 - 137
  • [40] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF EPPS
    CAPUTO, DV
    PSATHAS, G
    PLAPP, JM
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26 (04) : 883 - &