Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity

被引:23
|
作者
Aday, Jacob S. [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Joshua M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Michigan Univ, Marquette, MI 49855 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Psychol, 101 Sloan Hall, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
Attention bias; Dot-probe task; Test-retest reliability; Target location; Anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; TIME-COURSE; FEARFUL; THREAT; BIAS; ANXIETY; DISENGAGEMENT; CAPTURE; HOLD;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-018-0886-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The dot-probe task is used to measure attentional biases toward threat. However, the test-retest reliability and validity of the task have been called into question. No studies to date have included an extended number of testing sessions or tailored the task to individual participants by incorporating self-relevant stimulidoing so may improve reliability. Here, participants provided 10 words that caused them anxiety and 10 neutral words which were incorporated into a dot-probe task for 6 sessions. The test-retest reliability of their bias indices was stronger in bottom-target trials relative to top-target trials and stronger among later relative to earlier sessions. State and trait anxiety were moderately correlated with bias indices in later sessions, but not earlier sessions. Overall reaction time in each session was moderately correlated with state and trait anxiety. These results suggest that including extended testing may facilitate dot-probe task test-retest reliability and validity.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and test-retest reliability of a kinesthetic perception test for blind people
    Prasetyo, Hendrig Joko
    Purnama, Sapta Kunta
    Doewes, Rumi Iqbal
    Syaifullah, Rony
    Sugiyanto
    SPORT TK-REVISTA EUROAMERICANA DE CIENCIAS DEL DEPORTE, 2022, 11
  • [22] Test-Retest Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Implicit Association Test in Children
    Rae, James R.
    Olson, Kristina R.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 54 (02) : 308 - 330
  • [23] Test-retest reliability and validity of the Importance of Olfaction Questionnaire in Denmark
    Konieczny, Daniel Tchemerinsky
    Fjaeldstad, Alexander Wieck
    Sandberg, Kristian
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [24] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Standardized Video Interview
    Jayakumar, Kishore L.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (11) : 1599 - 1599
  • [25] Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the information processing styles
    Baloglu, M
    Zelhart, PF
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2000, 87 (03) : 973 - 979
  • [26] High Test-Retest Reliability of the Extended Version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" Test
    Haehner, Antje
    Mayer, Anna-Maria
    Landis, Basile N.
    Pournaras, Irene
    Lill, Katja
    Gudziol, Volker
    Hummel, Thomas
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2009, 34 (08) : 705 - 711
  • [27] Test-retest Reliability And Validity Of The Occupational Physical Activity Questionnaire
    Reis, Jared P.
    DuBose, Katrina D.
    Ainsworth, Barbara E.
    Macera, Caroline A.
    Yore, Michelle M.
    Jones, Deborah A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S110 - S111
  • [28] Computerized Dual-Task Testing of Gait Visuomotor and Cognitive Functions in Parkinson's Disease: Test-Retest Reliability and Validity
    Bhatt, Mayank
    Mahana, Bhuvan
    Ko, Ji Hyun
    Kolesar, Tiffany A. A.
    Kanitkar, Anuprita
    Szturm, Tony
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [29] Kuder Career Search: Test-retest reliability and consequential validity
    Ihle-Helledy, K
    Zytowski, DG
    Fouad, NA
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [30] Test-retest reliability and validity studies of the skills confidence inventory
    Parsons, E
    Betz, NE
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 1998, 6 (01) : 1 - 12