Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test-retest reliability and validity

被引:23
|
作者
Aday, Jacob S. [1 ,2 ]
Carlson, Joshua M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northern Michigan Univ, Marquette, MI 49855 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Psychol, 101 Sloan Hall, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
Attention bias; Dot-probe task; Test-retest reliability; Target location; Anxiety; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; TIME-COURSE; FEARFUL; THREAT; BIAS; ANXIETY; DISENGAGEMENT; CAPTURE; HOLD;
D O I
10.1007/s10339-018-0886-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The dot-probe task is used to measure attentional biases toward threat. However, the test-retest reliability and validity of the task have been called into question. No studies to date have included an extended number of testing sessions or tailored the task to individual participants by incorporating self-relevant stimulidoing so may improve reliability. Here, participants provided 10 words that caused them anxiety and 10 neutral words which were incorporated into a dot-probe task for 6 sessions. The test-retest reliability of their bias indices was stronger in bottom-target trials relative to top-target trials and stronger among later relative to earlier sessions. State and trait anxiety were moderately correlated with bias indices in later sessions, but not earlier sessions. Overall reaction time in each session was moderately correlated with state and trait anxiety. These results suggest that including extended testing may facilitate dot-probe task test-retest reliability and validity.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extended testing with the dot-probe task increases test–retest reliability and validity
    Jacob S. Aday
    Joshua M. Carlson
    Cognitive Processing, 2019, 20 : 65 - 72
  • [2] Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task
    Chapman, Angus
    Devue, Christel
    Grimshaw, Gina M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2019, 83 (02): : 308 - 320
  • [3] Fleeting reliability in the dot-probe task
    Angus Chapman
    Christel Devue
    Gina M. Grimshaw
    Psychological Research, 2019, 83 : 308 - 320
  • [4] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Experiential Discounting Task
    Smits, Rochelle R.
    Stein, Jeffrey S.
    Johnson, Patrick S.
    Odum, Amy L.
    Madden, Gregory J.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 21 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [5] Extended version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" identification test: Test-retest reliability and validity
    Sorokowska, A.
    Albrecht, E.
    Haehner, A.
    Hummel, T.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2015, 243 : 111 - 114
  • [6] The concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a visuospatial working memory task
    Hockey, A
    Geffen, G
    INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 32 (06) : 591 - 605
  • [7] Computerized Dual-Task Testing of Gait and Visuospatial Cognitive Functions; Test-Retest Reliability and Validity
    Szturm, Tony J.
    Sakhalkar, Vedant S.
    Kanitkar, Anuprita
    Nankar, Mayur
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11 : 1 - 11
  • [8] Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Pro-Environmental Behavior Task
    Lange, Florian
    Dewitte, Siegfried
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 73
  • [9] Test-Retest Reliability of a Social Interaction Task
    Merkulova, Ekaterina
    Savostyanov, Alexander
    Bocharov, Andrey
    Proshina, Ekaterina
    Knyazev, Gennady
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [10] Test-retest reliability of an emotion maintenance task
    Broome, Rose
    Gard, David E.
    Mikels, Joseph A.
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2012, 26 (04) : 737 - 747